Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMIX vs FHLSX
BKMIX vs FHLSX Comparison
Open Charts BKMIX vs FHLSX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio K
Price$10.50
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.5B
Fidelity Health Savings
Price$10.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.34M
BKMIX vs FHLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMIX vs. FHLSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMIX is a Buy and FHLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMIX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FHLSX (64.3M). BKMIX pays higher dividends than FHLSX: BKMIX (5.95) vs FHLSX (2.77). BKMIX was incepted earlier than FHLSX: BKMIX (9 years) vs FHLSX (5 years). BKMIX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FHLSX (0.49). BKMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FHLSX (28.00). FHLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMIX: FHLSX (0) vs BKMIX (5000000). BKMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.14 vs. FHLSX (8.58). BKMIX return over 5 years is better than : 28.36 vs. FHLSX (17.29).
| BKMIX | FHLSX | BKMIX / FHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.49 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.49 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.796 | 7.692 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 64.3M | 16,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.95 | 2.77 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 8.58 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | 17.86 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.36 | 17.29 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement