BKQNY
Price
$9.00
Change
+$0.08 (+0.90%)
Updated
Dec 6 closing price
HCKG
Price
$19.22
Change
+$0.44 (+2.34%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

BKQNY vs HCKG

Header iconBKQNY vs HCKG Comparison
Open Charts BKQNY vs HCKGBanner chart's image
Bank of Queensland
Price$9.00
Change+$0.08 (+0.90%)
Volume$171
CapitalizationN/A
Hocking Valley Bancshares, Inc. (OH)
Price$19.22
Change+$0.44 (+2.34%)
Volume$3.92K
CapitalizationN/A
BKQNY vs HCKG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BKQNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCKG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKQNY vs. HCKG commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKQNY is a Buy and HCKG is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BKQNY: $9.00 vs. HCKG: $19.22)
Brand notoriety: BKQNY and HCKG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKQNY: 40% vs. HCKG: 188%
Market capitalization -- BKQNY: $2.62B vs. HCKG: $0
BKQNY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.62B. HCKG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKQNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCKG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKQNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCKG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKQNY is a better buy in the long-term than HCKG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKQNY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCKG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKQNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HCKG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCKG is a better buy in the short-term than BKQNY.

Price Growth

BKQNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HCKG (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKQNY YTD gains are higher at: 25.352 vs. HCKG (12.504).
BKQNYHCKGBKQNY / HCKG
Capitalization2.62BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.35212.504203%
P/E Ratio19.31N/A-
Revenue1.75BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKQNY vs HCKG: Fundamental Ratings
BKQNY
HCKG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9086
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1059
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9437
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCKG's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as BKQNY (45). This means that HCKG’s stock grew similarly to BKQNY’s over the last 12 months.

HCKG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BKQNY (100). This means that HCKG’s stock grew similarly to BKQNY’s over the last 12 months.

BKQNY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCKG (59). This means that BKQNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCKG’s over the last 12 months.

BKQNY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as HCKG (52). This means that BKQNY’s stock grew similarly to HCKG’s over the last 12 months.

HCKG's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKQNY (94). This means that HCKG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKQNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKQNYHCKG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BKQNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCKG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDVRX22.72N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Value R
FSEKX13.53-0.06
-0.44%
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable U.S. Eq A
JSMVX19.04-0.14
-0.73%
Jackson Square SMID-Cap Growth Inv
SMBYX41.48-0.48
-1.14%
ClearBridge Mid Cap I
AVUAX15.79-1.21
-7.11%
American Century Mid Cap Value I

BKQNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKQNY has been loosely correlated with BKAHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKQNY jumps, then BKAHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKQNY
1D Price
Change %
BKQNY100%
N/A
BKAHF - BKQNY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HCKG - BKQNY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLEW - BKQNY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKNIY - BKQNY
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
BKRIF - BKQNY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More

HCKG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCKG and KNFSF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCKG and KNFSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCKG
1D Price
Change %
HCKG100%
N/A
KNFSF - HCKG
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCFC - HCKG
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOY - HCKG
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKQNY - HCKG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKALF - HCKG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More