BKU
Price
$38.16
Change
+$0.26 (+0.69%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.85B
29 days until earnings call
FNWB
Price
$7.34
Change
+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
65.25M
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKU vs FNWB

Header iconBKU vs FNWB Comparison
Open Charts BKU vs FNWBBanner chart's image
Bankunited
Price$38.16
Change+$0.26 (+0.69%)
Volume$10.45K
Capitalization2.85B
First Northwest Ban
Price$7.34
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization65.25M
BKU vs FNWB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKU vs. FNWB commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKU is a Buy and FNWB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BKU: $37.91 vs. FNWB: $7.33)
Brand notoriety: BKU and FNWB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKU: 112% vs. FNWB: 89%
Market capitalization -- BKU: $2.85B vs. FNWB: $65.25M
BKU [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.85B. FNWB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $65.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKU is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNWB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FNWB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKU is a better buy in the short-term than FNWB.

Price Growth

BKU (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.35% price change this week, while FNWB (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

BKU is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.33% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKU($2.85B) has a higher market cap than FNWB($65.3M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than BKU: FNWB (43.38) vs BKU (11.15). BKU YTD gains are higher at: 1.959 vs. FNWB (-27.199). FNWB has less debt than BKU: FNWB (360M) vs BKU (2.96B). BKU has higher revenues than FNWB: BKU (1.05B) vs FNWB (65.2M).
BKUFNWBBKU / FNWB
Capitalization2.85B65.3M4,366%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.959-27.199-7%
P/E Ratio11.1543.3826%
Revenue1.05B65.2M1,612%
Total CashN/A16.8M-
Total Debt2.96B360M823%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKU vs FNWB: Fundamental Ratings
BKU
FNWB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
553
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
1392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5086
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
843
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKU's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (89) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BKU’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

BKU's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BKU’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

BKU's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWB (92) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BKU’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

BKU's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (86) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BKU’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BKU (84) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew significantly faster than BKU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKUFNWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVCTF0.150.01
+4.31%
INVICTUS ENERGY LTD.
OSCUF9.75N/A
N/A
Japan Exchange Group, Inc.
WFRSF1.76N/A
N/A
West African Resources Ltd.
FRFFF18.29N/A
N/A
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd.
UPYY1.40N/A
N/A
UPAY INC.

BKU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKU has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKU jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKU
1D Price
Change %
BKU100%
-0.97%
FNB - BKU
92%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
UCB - BKU
90%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
HWC - BKU
90%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
ASB - BKU
90%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
WTFC - BKU
89%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
More

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with OZKAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then OZKAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
+0.55%
OZKAP - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
CMA - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
BKU - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
UCB - FNWB
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
AX - FNWB
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.27%
More