It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKXSCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KXSCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BL (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.03% price change this week, while KXSCF (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.
BL is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BL | KXSCF | BL / KXSCF | |
Capitalization | 3.99B | 3.82B | 104% |
EBITDA | 117M | 34.9M | 335% |
Gain YTD | 3.235 | 13.831 | 23% |
P/E Ratio | 78.96 | 434.78 | 18% |
Revenue | 590M | 370M | 159% |
Total Cash | 1.2B | 273M | 441% |
Total Debt | 1.41B | 55.3M | 2,550% |
BL | KXSCF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BL's Valuation (83) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as KXSCF (90) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to KXSCF’s over the last 12 months.
KXSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BL (85) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that KXSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BL’s over the last 12 months.
BL's SMR Rating (22) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KXSCF (83) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew somewhat faster than KXSCF’s over the last 12 months.
BL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as KXSCF (44) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to KXSCF’s over the last 12 months.
BL's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as KXSCF (92) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to KXSCF’s over the last 12 months.
BL | KXSCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago72% | 8 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago72% | 6 days ago65% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago57% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PQNAX | 26.78 | N/A | N/A |
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value A | |||
TOWFX | 15.87 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
Towpath Focus Institutional | |||
CIVVX | 20.47 | -0.15 | -0.73% |
Causeway International Value Inv | |||
DFUEX | 29.65 | -0.23 | -0.77% |
DFA US Social Core Equity 2 Portfolio | |||
TPLIX | 13.81 | -0.11 | -0.79% |
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth I |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BL has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BL jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KXSCF has been loosely correlated with DSGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KXSCF jumps, then DSGX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KXSCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KXSCF | 100% | N/A | ||
DSGX - KXSCF | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
PTC - KXSCF | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
ADSK - KXSCF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
CYBR - KXSCF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
BL - KXSCF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
More |