BL
Price
$57.35
Change
-$0.87 (-1.49%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.99B
66 days until earnings call
KXSCF
Price
$144.93
Change
+$1.02 (+0.71%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.82B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BL vs KXSCF

Header iconBL vs KXSCF Comparison
Open Charts BL vs KXSCFBanner chart's image
BlackLine
Price$57.35
Change-$0.87 (-1.49%)
Volume$1.41M
Capitalization3.99B
Kinaxis
Price$144.93
Change+$1.02 (+0.71%)
Volume$3.55K
Capitalization3.82B
BL vs KXSCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BL vs. KXSCF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BL is a StrongBuy and KXSCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BL: $57.35 vs. KXSCF: $144.93)
Brand notoriety: BL and KXSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BL: 184% vs. KXSCF: 2%
Market capitalization -- BL: $3.99B vs. KXSCF: $3.82B
BL [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.99B. KXSCF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKXSCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KXSCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BL is a better buy in the long-term than KXSCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.54% price change this week, while KXSCF (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BL is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.60% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BL($3.99B) and KXSCF($3.82B) have the same market capitalization . KXSCF has higher P/E ratio than BL: KXSCF (434.78) vs BL (78.96). KXSCF YTD gains are higher at: 20.776 vs. BL (-5.612). BL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 117M vs. KXSCF (34.9M). BL has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. KXSCF (273M). KXSCF has less debt than BL: KXSCF (55.3M) vs BL (1.41B). BL has higher revenues than KXSCF: BL (590M) vs KXSCF (370M).
BLKXSCFBL / KXSCF
Capitalization3.99B3.82B104%
EBITDA117M34.9M335%
Gain YTD-5.61220.776-27%
P/E Ratio78.96434.7818%
Revenue590M370M159%
Total Cash1.2B273M441%
Total Debt1.41B55.3M2,550%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BL vs KXSCF: Fundamental Ratings
BL
KXSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2387
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
2287
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BL's Valuation (80) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as KXSCF (93) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to KXSCF’s over the last 12 months.

KXSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as BL (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that KXSCF’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.

BL's SMR Rating (22) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KXSCF (87) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew somewhat faster than KXSCF’s over the last 12 months.

BL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as KXSCF (42) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to KXSCF’s over the last 12 months.

KXSCF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BL (49) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that KXSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICLN12.950.10
+0.78%
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
EWJV35.040.22
+0.63%
iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF
AUDCAD0.89N/A
N/A
Australian Dollar - Canadian Dollar
CHFGBP0.900.00
N/A
Switzerland Franc - United Kingdom Pound
GBPJPY194.93N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Japan Yen

KXSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KXSCF has been loosely correlated with DSGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KXSCF jumps, then DSGX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KXSCF
1D Price
Change %
KXSCF100%
+0.71%
DSGX - KXSCF
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
PTC - KXSCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
ADSK - KXSCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
CYBR - KXSCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
BL - KXSCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
More