BLD vs WSPOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLD is a Hold and WSPOF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWSPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WSPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BLD (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while WSPOF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +9.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +2.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+2.88% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| BLD | WSPOF | BLD / WSPOF | |
| Capitalization | 8.35B | 23.2B | 36% |
| EBITDA | 1.05B | 1.92B | 55% |
| Gain YTD | -8.335 | 1.438 | -580% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.07 | 46.44 | 30% |
| Revenue | 5.33B | 16.2B | 33% |
| Total Cash | 400M | 792M | 51% |
| Total Debt | 1.58B | 5.66B | 28% |
BLD | WSPOF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLD's Valuation (60) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as WSPOF (88) in the null industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew similarly to WSPOF’s over the last 12 months.
WSPOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BLD (36) in the Building Products industry. This means that WSPOF’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.
BLD's SMR Rating (38) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSPOF (71) in the null industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSPOF’s over the last 12 months.
WSPOF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLD (80) in the Building Products industry. This means that WSPOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLD’s over the last 12 months.
WSPOF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BLD (80) in the Building Products industry. This means that WSPOF’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.
| BLD | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VPL | 72.36 | 1.15 | +1.61% |
| Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | |||
| TPHD | 35.20 | 0.41 | +1.18% |
| Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF | |||
| ROBO | 47.59 | 0.21 | +0.44% |
| Robo Global® Robotics&Automation ETF | |||
| QPX | 32.82 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | |||
| FLMB | 22.93 | -0.04 | -0.18% |
| Franklin Municipal Green Bond ETF | |||
WSPOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WSPOF and APG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WSPOF and APG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WSPOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSPOF | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| APG - WSPOF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| BLD - WSPOF | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.18% | ||
| GVA - WSPOF | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| PWR - WSPOF | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| MYRG - WSPOF | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||