It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLDP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLWT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLDP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLWT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BLDP (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -5.19% price change this week, while CLWT (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.88%.
BLDP is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
CLWT is expected to report earnings on Dec 28, 2022.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
BLDP | CLWT | BLDP / CLWT | |
Capitalization | 985M | 10.8M | 9,120% |
EBITDA | -129.42M | 1.32M | -9,827% |
Gain YTD | -65.405 | -8.039 | 814% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 35.00 | - |
Revenue | 102M | 21.4M | 477% |
Total Cash | 753M | 5.27M | 14,291% |
Total Debt | 17.9M | 592K | 3,024% |
BLDP | CLWT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLDP's Valuation (47) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CLWT (50) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that BLDP’s stock grew similarly to CLWT’s over the last 12 months.
CLWT's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLDP (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CLWT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLDP’s over the last 12 months.
CLWT's SMR Rating (60) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as BLDP (92) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CLWT’s stock grew similarly to BLDP’s over the last 12 months.
CLWT's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLDP (93) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CLWT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLDP’s over the last 12 months.
CLWT's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as BLDP (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CLWT’s stock grew similarly to BLDP’s over the last 12 months.
BLDP | CLWT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 12 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago76% | 25 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago87% | 11 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLWT and AMSC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLWT and AMSC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLWT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLWT | 100% | -0.69% | ||
AMSC - CLWT | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.72% | ||
BLDP - CLWT | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
PCTTU - CLWT | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
ATS - CLWT | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.16% | ||
PSN - CLWT | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
More |