BLDR
Price
$149.21
Change
+$5.94 (+4.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.49B
54 days until earnings call
GMS
Price
$109.96
Change
-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.2B
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLDR vs GMS

Header iconBLDR vs GMS Comparison
Open Charts BLDR vs GMSBanner chart's image
Builders FirstSource
Price$149.21
Change+$5.94 (+4.15%)
Volume$2.47M
Capitalization16.49B
GMS
Price$109.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Volume$713.43K
Capitalization4.2B
BLDR vs GMS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLDR vs. GMS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLDR is a Hold and GMS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLDR: $149.21 vs. GMS: $109.96)
Brand notoriety: BLDR and GMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLDR: 118% vs. GMS: 57%
Market capitalization -- BLDR: $16.49B vs. GMS: $4.2B
BLDR [@Building Products] is valued at $16.49B. GMS’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $4.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $92.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLDR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLDR is a better buy in the long-term than GMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLDR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLDR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLDR is a better buy in the short-term than GMS.

Price Growth

BLDR (@Building Products) experienced а +7.59% price change this week, while GMS (@Building Products) price change was +0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLDR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

GMS is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+2.64% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLDR($16.5B) has a higher market cap than GMS($4.2B). GMS has higher P/E ratio than BLDR: GMS (41.81) vs BLDR (22.57). GMS YTD gains are higher at: 29.624 vs. BLDR (4.394). BLDR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.8B vs. GMS (428M). BLDR has more cash in the bank: 87M vs. GMS (55.6M). GMS has less debt than BLDR: GMS (1.6B) vs BLDR (5.32B). BLDR has higher revenues than GMS: BLDR (15.9B) vs GMS (5.51B).
BLDRGMSBLDR / GMS
Capitalization16.5B4.2B393%
EBITDA1.8B428M420%
Gain YTD4.39429.62415%
P/E Ratio22.5741.8154%
Revenue15.9B5.51B288%
Total Cash87M55.6M156%
Total Debt5.32B1.6B333%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLDR vs GMS: Fundamental Ratings
BLDR
GMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6923
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4018
SMR RATING
1..100
4977
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
155
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLDR's Valuation (66) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as GMS (72) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that BLDR’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as BLDR (40) in the Building Products industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to BLDR’s over the last 12 months.

BLDR's SMR Rating (49) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as GMS (77) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that BLDR’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as BLDR (48) in the Building Products industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to BLDR’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as BLDR (15) in the Building Products industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to BLDR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLDRGMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTES101.810.21
+0.21%
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exmpt Bd ETF
GLDI165.600.24
+0.15%
UBS ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETN
FSLD50.28N/A
N/A
Fidelity Sustainable Low Dur Bd ETF
NDAA20.98N/A
N/A
Ned Davis Research 360 Dyn Allc ETF
PALC50.57-0.09
-0.18%
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Mlt Ftr Alt ETF

BLDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLDR has been closely correlated with MAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLDR jumps, then MAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLDR
1D Price
Change %
BLDR100%
+4.15%
MAS - BLDR
77%
Closely correlated
+2.83%
FBIN - BLDR
77%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
BXC - BLDR
76%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
OC - BLDR
70%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
TREX - BLDR
68%
Closely correlated
+3.76%
More

GMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been closely correlated with BXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BXC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMS
1D Price
Change %
GMS100%
N/A
BXC - GMS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
IR - GMS
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
BLDR - GMS
51%
Loosely correlated
+4.15%
CODYY - GMS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
OC - GMS
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
More