BLFY
Price
$9.64
Change
-$0.06 (-0.62%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
227.8M
59 days until earnings call
CBFV
Price
$28.52
Change
-$0.65 (-2.23%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
111.19M
61 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLFY vs CBFV

Header iconBLFY vs CBFV Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs CBFVBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$9.64
Change-$0.06 (-0.62%)
Volume$49.96K
Capitalization227.8M
CB Financial Services
Price$28.52
Change-$0.65 (-2.23%)
Volume$17K
Capitalization111.19M
BLFY vs CBFV Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. CBFV commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Hold and CBFV is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BLFY: $9.64 vs. CBFV: $28.52)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and CBFV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 101% vs. CBFV: 175%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $227.8M vs. CBFV: $111.19M
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $227.8M. CBFV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $111.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCBFV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CBFV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.70% price change this week, while CBFV (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLFY($228M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($111M). BLFY has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: BLFY (500.00) vs CBFV (4.89). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 0.608 vs. BLFY (-1.733). CBFV has less debt than BLFY: CBFV (34.7M) vs BLFY (424M). BLFY (43.7M) and CBFV (42.4M) have equivalent revenues.
BLFYCBFVBLFY / CBFV
Capitalization228M111M205%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.7330.608-285%
P/E Ratio500.004.8910,228%
Revenue43.7M42.4M103%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt424M34.7M1,222%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
37
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RISSX12.16-0.08
-0.65%
RBC International Small Cap Equity A
DFMIX35.06-0.56
-1.57%
Davidson Multi-Cap Equity I
BAFSX45.84-1.05
-2.24%
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inst
DAABX19.59-0.46
-2.29%
DFA US Sustainability Targeted Val Instl
FSSZX36.89-0.99
-2.61%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp Z

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
-0.62%
UBSI - BLFY
77%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
FMBH - BLFY
76%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
TOWN - BLFY
76%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
FCBC - BLFY
76%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
FFBC - BLFY
76%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
More

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with BLFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then BLFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-2.23%
BLFY - CBFV
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
EBC - CBFV
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
WAL - CBFV
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
VBTX - CBFV
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
SSB - CBFV
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
More