BLFY
Price
$11.36
Change
-$0.06 (-0.53%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
237.09M
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FHB
Price
$24.92
Change
-$0.25 (-0.99%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.08B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFY vs FHB

Header iconBLFY vs FHB Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs FHBBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$11.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.53%)
Volume$51.82K
Capitalization237.09M
First Hawaiian
Price$24.92
Change-$0.25 (-0.99%)
Volume$856.04K
Capitalization3.08B
BLFY vs FHB Comparison Chart in %
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. FHB commentary
Nov 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a StrongBuy and FHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BLFY: $11.36 vs. FHB: $24.92)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and FHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 46% vs. FHB: 70%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $237.09M vs. FHB: $3.08B
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $237.09M. FHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFHB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FHB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHB is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FHB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHB is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +43.43% price change this week, while FHB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

FHB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.67% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHB($3.08B) has a higher market cap than BLFY($237M). BLFY YTD gains are higher at: 15.800 vs. FHB (0.115). FHB has less debt than BLFY: FHB (250M) vs BLFY (367M). FHB has higher revenues than BLFY: FHB (810M) vs BLFY (42.6M).
BLFYFHBBLFY / FHB
Capitalization237M3.08B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.8000.11513,772%
P/E RatioN/A12.16-
Revenue42.6M810M5%
Total CashN/A305M-
Total Debt367M250M147%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHB: Fundamental Ratings
FHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYFHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USPFX34.260.37
+1.09%
Union Street Partners Value Advisor
AAUTX33.570.18
+0.54%
Thrivent Large Cap Value A
FNITX44.94N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor New Insights M
MSTSX12.18N/A
N/A
Morningstar Global Opportunistic Equity
WBEIX15.61-0.04
-0.26%
William Blair Emerging Mkts Growth I

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
-0.53%
HOPE - BLFY
71%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
BY - BLFY
71%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
GNTY - BLFY
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
NIC - BLFY
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
FHB - BLFY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
More

FHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHB
1D Price
Change %
FHB100%
-0.99%
UBSI - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
FNB - FHB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
AUB - FHB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
UCB - FHB
87%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
WSFS - FHB
87%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
More