BLFY
Price
$8.92
Change
-$0.25 (-2.73%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
191.74M
66 days until earnings call
FNWD
Price
$29.61
Change
+$0.02 (+0.07%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
128.06M
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLFY vs FNWD

Header iconBLFY vs FNWD Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs FNWDBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$8.92
Change-$0.25 (-2.73%)
Volume$24.48K
Capitalization191.74M
Finward Ban
Price$29.61
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
Volume$53.51K
Capitalization128.06M
BLFY vs FNWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. FNWD commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Hold and FNWD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BLFY: $8.92 vs. FNWD: $29.61)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and FNWD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 42% vs. FNWD: 104%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $191.74M vs. FNWD: $128.06M
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $191.74M. FNWD’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $128.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNWD is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNWD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FNWD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNWD is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.72% price change this week, while FNWD (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

FNWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLFY($192M) has a higher market cap than FNWD($128M). FNWD YTD gains are higher at: 6.217 vs. BLFY (-9.072). FNWD has less debt than BLFY: FNWD (25M) vs BLFY (358M). FNWD has higher revenues than BLFY: FNWD (61.4M) vs BLFY (40.6M).
BLFYFNWDBLFY / FNWD
Capitalization192M128M150%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.0726.217-146%
P/E RatioN/A23.88-
Revenue40.6M61.4M66%
Total CashN/A23.1M-
Total Debt358M25M1,432%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWD: Fundamental Ratings
FNWD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
20
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
75
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
17

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYFNWD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LQWDF1.480.01
+0.68%
LQWD TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
ELFIF10.720.06
+0.56%
E L Financial Ltd.
ASWRF0.02N/A
N/A
Gungnir Resources Inc.
NNGPF70.50N/A
N/A
NN Group NV
RPGHF1.69N/A
N/A
RPMGLOBAL HLDGS LTD.

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
-2.73%
FCBC - BLFY
79%
Closely correlated
-2.33%
TCBK - BLFY
79%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
AROW - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
-2.66%
FMBH - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
-2.82%
EQBK - BLFY
77%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
More

FNWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNWD and TCBK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNWD and TCBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWD
1D Price
Change %
FNWD100%
+0.07%
TCBK - FNWD
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
HFWA - FNWD
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
FRST - FNWD
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
GBCI - FNWD
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
BLFY - FNWD
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
More