BLFY
Price
$8.56
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
227.8M
11 days until earnings call
RBCAA
Price
$60.66
Change
+$0.09 (+0.15%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
954.62M
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLFY vs RBCAA

Header iconBLFY vs RBCAA Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs RBCAABanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$8.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$32.84K
Capitalization227.8M
Republic Ban
Price$60.66
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
Volume$16.64K
Capitalization954.62M
BLFY vs RBCAA Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBCAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. RBCAA commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Hold and RBCAA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BLFY: $8.56 vs. RBCAA: $60.66)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and RBCAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 67% vs. RBCAA: 58%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $227.8M vs. RBCAA: $954.62M
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $227.8M. RBCAA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $954.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBCAA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RBCAA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBCAA is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBCAA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RBCAA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBCAA is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.49% price change this week, while RBCAA (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

RBCAA is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBCAA($955M) has a higher market cap than BLFY($228M). BLFY has higher P/E ratio than RBCAA: BLFY (500.00) vs RBCAA (10.65). RBCAA (-12.574) and BLFY (-12.742) have similar YTD gains . RBCAA (416M) and BLFY (424M) have identical debt. RBCAA has higher revenues than BLFY: RBCAA (354M) vs BLFY (43.7M).
BLFYRBCAABLFY / RBCAA
Capitalization228M955M24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.742-12.574101%
P/E Ratio500.0010.654,695%
Revenue43.7M354M12%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt424M416M102%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBCAA: Fundamental Ratings
RBCAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
25

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYRBCAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBCAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIVHX16.820.26
+1.57%
American Funds International Vntg R-2E
FMFAX77.93N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Materials A
WGFIX9.87N/A
N/A
William Blair Global Leaders I
SLARX26.59N/A
N/A
DWS Latin America Equity Inst
ACIHX51.96N/A
N/A
American Century Growth G

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
N/A
FCBC - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
TMP - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
TCBK - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
UBSI - BLFY
77%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
RBCAA - BLFY
77%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
More

RBCAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBCAA has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBCAA jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBCAA
1D Price
Change %
RBCAA100%
+0.15%
CTBI - RBCAA
87%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
FCBC - RBCAA
86%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
THFF - RBCAA
86%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
GSBC - RBCAA
85%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
NWBI - RBCAA
85%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
More