BLFY
Price
$10.04
Change
-$0.40 (-3.83%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
35 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$22.17
Change
-$1.22 (-5.22%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLFY vs SFNC

Header iconBLFY vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$10.04
Change-$0.40 (-3.83%)
Volume$1.2K
CapitalizationN/A
Simmons First National
Price$22.17
Change-$1.22 (-5.22%)
Volume$30.93K
CapitalizationN/A
BLFY vs SFNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. SFNC commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Hold and SFNC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BLFY: $10.44 vs. SFNC: $23.39)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 93% vs. SFNC: 125%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $227.8M vs. SFNC: $2.42B
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $227.8M. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFNC is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFNC is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.42B) has a higher market cap than BLFY($228M). BLFY has higher P/E ratio than SFNC: BLFY (500.00) vs SFNC (13.98). SFNC YTD gains are higher at: 23.072 vs. BLFY (7.963). BLFY has less debt than SFNC: BLFY (424M) vs SFNC (1.34B). SFNC has higher revenues than BLFY: SFNC (782M) vs BLFY (43.7M).
BLFYSFNCBLFY / SFNC
Capitalization228M2.42B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.96323.07235%
P/E Ratio500.0013.983,577%
Revenue43.7M782M6%
Total CashN/A345M-
Total Debt424M1.34B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIRNX28.16N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG Inv
VEIPX46.01-0.32
-0.69%
Vanguard Equity-Income Inv
ATGAX36.43-0.27
-0.74%
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp A
BRSTX15.34-0.16
-1.03%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R3
FWTFX34.96-0.39
-1.10%
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
-0.85%
UBSI - BLFY
79%
Closely correlated
-2.49%
SFNC - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
-2.01%
QCRH - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
-1.99%
FCBC - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
FFBC - BLFY
77%
Closely correlated
-2.32%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
-2.01%
UBSI - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
-2.49%
SBCF - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
-3.26%
WSFS - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
BUSE - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
-2.35%
WSBC - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
More