BLHK
Price
$29.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
174.99M
CMTDF
Price
$29.82
Change
+$2.12 (+7.65%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
19.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLHK vs CMTDF

Header iconBLHK vs CMTDF Comparison
Open Charts BLHK vs CMTDFBanner chart's image
BlueHarbor Bank (Mooresville NC)
Price$29.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$141
Capitalization174.99M
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$29.82
Change+$2.12 (+7.65%)
Volume$103
Capitalization19.79B
BLHK vs CMTDF Comparison Chart in %
BLHK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLHK vs. CMTDF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLHK is a Hold and CMTDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLHK: $29.70 vs. CMTDF: $29.82)
Brand notoriety: BLHK and CMTDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLHK: 13% vs. CMTDF: 2%
Market capitalization -- BLHK: $174.99M vs. CMTDF: $19.79B
BLHK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $174.99M. CMTDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $19.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLHK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMTDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLHK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMTDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLHK is a better buy in the long-term than CMTDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLHK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMTDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLHK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CMTDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMTDF is a better buy in the short-term than BLHK.

Price Growth

BLHK (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMTDF (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMTDF($19.8B) has a higher market cap than BLHK($175M). BLHK has higher P/E ratio than CMTDF: BLHK (14.42) vs CMTDF (11.18). BLHK (36.374) and CMTDF (35.825) have similar YTD gains . CMTDF has higher revenues than BLHK: CMTDF (1.52T) vs BLHK (18.6M).
BLHKCMTDFBLHK / CMTDF
Capitalization175M19.8B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.37435.825102%
P/E Ratio14.4211.18129%
Revenue18.6M1.52T0%
Total Cash5.89MN/A-
Total DebtN/A18.57T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLHK vs CMTDF: Fundamental Ratings
BLHK
CMTDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
850
SMR RATING
1..100
57100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLHK's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTDF (84). This means that BLHK’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHK's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMTDF (50). This means that BLHK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHK's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMTDF (100). This means that BLHK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHK's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTDF (51). This means that BLHK’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHK's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMTDF (95). This means that BLHK’s stock grew significantly faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLHKCMTDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
36%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLHK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABYEX10.100.04
+0.40%
AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Advisor
WSMRX28.200.08
+0.28%
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth R6
DTCCX16.090.03
+0.19%
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity C
KGROX13.270.01
+0.08%
Kennedy Capital Small Cap Growth Instl
MSGUX57.00-0.55
-0.96%
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth C

BLHK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLHK and BKKPF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLHK and BKKPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLHK
1D Price
Change %
BLHK100%
N/A
BKKPF - BLHK
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBCO - BLHK
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTDF - BLHK
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSHX - BLHK
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
ANDC - BLHK
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMTDF has been loosely correlated with CAIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMTDF jumps, then CAIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTDF
1D Price
Change %
CMTDF100%
N/A
CAIB - CMTDF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FLG - CMTDF
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
BPIRF - CMTDF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCN - CMTDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLHK - CMTDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More