BLHK
Price
$31.00
Change
+$0.55 (+1.81%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
182.65M
CSHX
Price
$69.00
Change
+$0.35 (+0.51%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
269.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLHK vs CSHX

Header iconBLHK vs CSHX Comparison
Open Charts BLHK vs CSHXBanner chart's image
BlueHarbor Bank (Mooresville NC)
Price$31.00
Change+$0.55 (+1.81%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization182.65M
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$69.00
Change+$0.35 (+0.51%)
Volume$444
Capitalization269.15M
BLHK vs CSHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLHK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLHK vs. CSHX commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLHK is a Buy and CSHX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BLHK: $31.00 vs. CSHX: $69.00)
Brand notoriety: BLHK and CSHX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLHK: 78% vs. CSHX: 17%
Market capitalization -- BLHK: $182.65M vs. CSHX: $269.15M
BLHK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $182.65M. CSHX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $269.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLHK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSHX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLHK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the long-term than BLHK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLHK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSHX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLHK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CSHX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLHK is a better buy in the short-term than CSHX.

Price Growth

BLHK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while CSHX (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHX($269M) has a higher market cap than BLHK($183M). BLHK has higher P/E ratio than CSHX: BLHK (15.05) vs CSHX (9.32). BLHK YTD gains are higher at: 42.343 vs. CSHX (21.320). CSHX has more cash in the bank: 33.9M vs. BLHK (5.89M). CSHX has higher revenues than BLHK: CSHX (81M) vs BLHK (18.6M).
BLHKCSHXBLHK / CSHX
Capitalization183M269M68%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD42.34321.320199%
P/E Ratio15.059.32161%
Revenue18.6M81M23%
Total Cash5.89M33.9M17%
Total DebtN/A84M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLHK vs CSHX: Fundamental Ratings
BLHK
CSHX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8924
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
640
SMR RATING
1..100
5642
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1424
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSHX's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BLHK (73). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to BLHK’s over the last 12 months.

BLHK's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSHX (40). This means that BLHK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BLHK (56). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to BLHK’s over the last 12 months.

BLHK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CSHX (50). This means that BLHK’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

BLHK's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CSHX (24). This means that BLHK’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLHKCSHX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLHK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSCMX17.44N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Insight C
RYRIX60.37N/A
N/A
Rydex Retailing Inv
RRGIX7.33N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Secc Inst
VSNGX67.39N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity I
BDAUX31.93-0.11
-0.34%
Baron Durable Advantage R6

BLHK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLHK and BKKPF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLHK and BKKPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLHK
1D Price
Change %
BLHK100%
N/A
BKKPF - BLHK
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBCO - BLHK
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTDF - BLHK
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSHX - BLHK
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANDC - BLHK
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSHX has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSHX jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
N/A
GPFOF - CSHX
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
BHLB - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
BRKL - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
More