Advertisement
BLHWF vs BURCA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLHWF is a Buy and BURCA is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLHWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBURCA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- BLHWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BURCA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLHWF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BURCA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLHWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- BURCA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BLHWF (@Building Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BURCA (@Building Products) price change was +2.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.36%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (+3.70% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| BLHWF | BURCA | BLHWF / BURCA | |
| Capitalization | 6.31B | 63.2M | 9,986% |
| EBITDA | 180M | 6M | 3,001% |
| Gain YTD | 41.887 | 81.389 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 37.90 | 6.74 | 562% |
| Revenue | 859M | 198M | 434% |
| Total Cash | 113M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 9.54M | 14.4M | 66% |
BLHWF | BURCA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BURCA's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLHWF (95). This means that BURCA’s stock grew significantly faster than BLHWF’s over the last 12 months.
BURCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLHWF (89). This means that BURCA’s stock grew significantly faster than BLHWF’s over the last 12 months.
BLHWF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BURCA (65). This means that BLHWF’s stock grew similarly to BURCA’s over the last 12 months.
BURCA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BLHWF (39). This means that BURCA’s stock grew similarly to BLHWF’s over the last 12 months.
BURCA's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BLHWF (16). This means that BURCA’s stock grew similarly to BLHWF’s over the last 12 months.
| BLHWF | BURCA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 21% | 1 day ago 34% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QQQP | 149.12 | 3.01 | +2.06% |
| Tradr 2X Long Innovation100 QuarterlyETF | |||
| SBIO | 30.85 | 0.21 | +0.69% |
| ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | |||
| GOOP | 25.89 | 0.11 | +0.44% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Google ETF | |||
| NMZ | 10.42 | -0.02 | -0.19% |
| Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund | |||
| HGLB | 8.63 | -0.03 | -0.35% |
| Highland Global Allocation Fund | |||
BLHWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BLHWF and CODGF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLHWF and CODGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLHWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLHWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CODGF - BLHWF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GBERF - BLHWF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
| DKILF - BLHWF | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.94% | ||
| BURCA - BLHWF | 0% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| GBERY - BLHWF | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||
BURCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BURCA and CODYY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BURCA and CODYY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BURCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BURCA | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| CODYY - BURCA | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| DKILY - BURCA | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| GBERY - BURCA | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
| DKILF - BURCA | 8% Poorly correlated | -4.94% | ||
| GBERF - BURCA | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||