BLIDF vs LAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLIDF is a Buy and LAC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLIDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BLIDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLIDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLIDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BLIDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -13.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
LAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.05% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| BLIDF | LAC | BLIDF / LAC | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 1.14B | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | -3.27M | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.690 | -54.219 | -12% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 196M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 3.11M | - |
LAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BLIDF | LAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 24% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 21 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 20% | 1 day ago 84% |
BLIDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLIDF has been loosely correlated with CMDRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLIDF jumps, then CMDRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLIDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLIDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CMDRF - BLIDF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NICOF - BLIDF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ABAT - BLIDF | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
| LZM - BLIDF | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.42% | ||
| LAC - BLIDF | 7% Poorly correlated | -6.39% | ||
More | ||||
LAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with PLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then PLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC | 100% | -6.39% | ||
| PLL - LAC | 55% Loosely correlated | -7.01% | ||
| MP - LAC | 48% Loosely correlated | -8.93% | ||
| SGML - LAC | 45% Loosely correlated | -5.88% | ||
| IE - LAC | 42% Loosely correlated | -8.30% | ||
| PMETF - LAC | 42% Loosely correlated | +28.28% | ||
More | ||||