BLIDF
Price
$31.38
Change
-$0.27 (-0.85%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
9.38B
LZM
Price
$4.55
Change
-$0.02 (-0.44%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
360.8M
109 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLIDF vs LZM

Header iconBLIDF vs LZM Comparison
Open Charts BLIDF vs LZMBanner chart's image
Boliden AB
Price$31.38
Change-$0.27 (-0.85%)
Volume$200
Capitalization9.38B
Lifezone Metals
Price$4.55
Change-$0.02 (-0.44%)
Volume$106.25K
Capitalization360.8M
BLIDF vs LZM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLIDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLIDF vs. LZM commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLIDF is a Hold and LZM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BLIDF: $31.38 vs. LZM: $4.55)
Brand notoriety: BLIDF and LZM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLIDF: 59% vs. LZM: 78%
Market capitalization -- BLIDF: $9.38B vs. LZM: $360.8M
BLIDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.38B. LZM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $360.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLIDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLIDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLIDF is a better buy in the long-term than LZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLIDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLIDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LZM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLIDF is a better buy in the short-term than LZM.

Price Growth

BLIDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLIDF($9.38B) has a higher market cap than LZM($361M). BLIDF YTD gains are higher at: 13.696 vs. LZM (-34.532). BLIDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.1B vs. LZM (-358.72M). BLIDF has more cash in the bank: 7.6B vs. LZM (63.5M). LZM has less debt than BLIDF: LZM (52M) vs BLIDF (27.4B). BLIDF has higher revenues than LZM: BLIDF (91.4B) vs LZM (1.02M).
BLIDFLZMBLIDF / LZM
Capitalization9.38B361M2,599%
EBITDA19.1B-358.72M-5,324%
Gain YTD13.696-34.532-40%
P/E Ratio10.26N/A-
Revenue91.4B1.02M8,952,008%
Total Cash7.6B63.5M11,973%
Total Debt27.4B52M52,692%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLIDFLZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLIDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STRPF0.260.01
+3.58%
Starr Peak Mining Ltd.
SMAWF273.465.04
+1.88%
Siemens AG
ELUXY12.660.21
+1.66%
AB Electrolux
QNBC34.99N/A
N/A
QNB Corp.
SEOFF11.05N/A
N/A
Stora Enso Oyj

LZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZM has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZM jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZM
1D Price
Change %
LZM100%
-0.44%
BHP - LZM
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
TECK - LZM
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
LAR - LZM
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
RIO - LZM
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
LAC - LZM
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
More