BLIDF
Price
$29.98
Change
+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
LZM
Price
$6.71
Change
-$0.31 (-4.42%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLIDF vs LZM

Header iconBLIDF vs LZM Comparison
Open Charts BLIDF vs LZMBanner chart's image
Boliden AB
Price$29.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Volume$11K
CapitalizationN/A
Lifezone Metals
Price$6.71
Change-$0.31 (-4.42%)
Volume$97.94K
CapitalizationN/A
BLIDF vs LZM Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLIDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLIDF vs. LZM commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLIDF is a Buy and LZM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BLIDF: $29.98 vs. LZM: $6.71)
Brand notoriety: BLIDF and LZM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLIDF: 626% vs. LZM: 112%
Market capitalization -- BLIDF: $0 vs. LZM: $627.96M
BLIDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $0. LZM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $627.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLIDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLIDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLIDF is a better buy in the long-term than LZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLIDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLIDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LZM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLIDF is a better buy in the short-term than LZM.

Price Growth

BLIDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZM is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLIDF YTD gains are higher at: 6.690 vs. LZM (-25.774).
BLIDFLZMBLIDF / LZM
CapitalizationN/A628M-
EBITDAN/A-32.95M-
Gain YTD6.690-25.774-26%
P/E RatioN/A1250.00-
RevenueN/A2.32M-
Total CashN/A44.4M-
Total DebtN/A496K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLIDFLZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLIDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDISX31.40-0.70
-2.18%
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Z
JAIGX43.69-1.00
-2.24%
Janus Henderson VIT Overseas Instl
BAILX10.65-0.26
-2.38%
Brown Advisory Sustainable Intl Ldrs Ins
CLVRX31.79-0.93
-2.84%
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx R6
VSSVX12.58-0.47
-3.60%
VALIC Company I Small Cap Special Val

BLIDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLIDF has been loosely correlated with CMDRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLIDF jumps, then CMDRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLIDF
1D Price
Change %
BLIDF100%
N/A
CMDRF - BLIDF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NICOF - BLIDF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ABAT - BLIDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
LZM - BLIDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.42%
LAC - BLIDF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.39%
More

LZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LZM and MTAL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LZM and MTAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZM
1D Price
Change %
LZM100%
-4.42%
MTAL - LZM
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.23%
AAGFF - LZM
23%
Poorly correlated
-12.47%
VZLA - LZM
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
LITOF - LZM
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
URG - LZM
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.17%
More