BLK
Price
$1004.96
Change
+$9.24 (+0.93%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
124.17B
83 days until earnings call
JHG
Price
$42.86
Change
+$0.77 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.22B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLK vs JHG

Header iconBLK vs JHG Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs JHGBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$1004.96
Change+$9.24 (+0.93%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization124.17B
Janus Henderson Group
Price$42.86
Change+$0.77 (+1.83%)
Volume$567.71K
Capitalization5.22B
BLK vs JHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. JHG commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a Hold and JHG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BLK: $1004.96 vs. JHG: $42.86)
Brand notoriety: BLK and JHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 140% vs. JHG: 58%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $124.17B vs. JHG: $5.22B
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $124.17B. JHG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJHG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the long-term than JHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JHG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JHG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the short-term than JHG.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.16% price change this week, while JHG (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

JHG is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($124B) has a higher market cap than JHG($5.22B). BLK has higher P/E ratio than JHG: BLK (22.65) vs JHG (13.66). JHG YTD gains are higher at: 0.776 vs. BLK (-1.966). BLK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.87B vs. JHG (563M). BLK has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. JHG (1.89B). JHG has less debt than BLK: JHG (382M) vs BLK (9.7B). BLK has higher revenues than JHG: BLK (17.9B) vs JHG (2.1B).
BLKJHGBLK / JHG
Capitalization124B5.22B2,375%
EBITDA7.87B563M1,399%
Gain YTD-1.9660.776-253%
P/E Ratio22.6513.66166%
Revenue17.9B2.1B852%
Total Cash10.6B1.89B562%
Total Debt9.7B382M2,540%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs JHG: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
JHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7525
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2131
SMR RATING
1..100
5573
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4425
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JHG's Valuation (75) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (87). This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as JHG (31). This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's SMR Rating (55) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as JHG (73). This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.

JHG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (47). This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

JHG's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (44). This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKJHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KALA7.250.24
+3.42%
Kala BIO
MLM542.5611.33
+2.13%
Martin Marietta Materials
GTES20.490.19
+0.94%
Gates Industrial Corp
CNNE19.06-0.11
-0.57%
Cannae Holdings
EDAP2.17-0.03
-1.36%
EDAP TMS SA

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been loosely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
+0.93%
JHG - BLK
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
BX - BLK
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
BN - BLK
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
TROW - BLK
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
BAM - BLK
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
More

JHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHG has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JHG jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHG
1D Price
Change %
JHG100%
+1.83%
APAM - JHG
74%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
TROW - JHG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
SEIC - JHG
69%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
BN - JHG
69%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
IVZ - JHG
68%
Closely correlated
+1.96%
More