Advertisement
BLK vs JPM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a Buy and JPM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileJPM’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- BLK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- JPM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JPM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- JPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while JPM (@Major Banks) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +135.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 10, 2025.
JPM is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-1.20% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Major Banks (-0.28% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| BLK | JPM | BLK / JPM | |
| Capitalization | 179B | 869B | 21% |
| EBITDA | 9.76B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.460 | 33.834 | 49% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.95 | 16.19 | 173% |
| Revenue | 21.6B | 175B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 11.6B | 22.1B | 52% |
| Total Debt | 14.7B | 485B | 3% |
BLK | JPM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 13 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLK's Valuation (82) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as JPM (91) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BLK (28) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (55) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BLK (19) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BLK (27) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
| BLK | JPM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 23 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 5 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDX | 75.72 | 1.04 | +1.39% |
| VanEck Gold Miners ETF | |||
| CCSO | 24.89 | 0.12 | +0.50% |
| Carbon Collective Climate Sol US Eq ETF | |||
| THYF | 52.56 | 0.16 | +0.30% |
| T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield ETF | |||
| TOV | 27.96 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF | |||
| FMF | 48.46 | -0.10 | -0.21% |
| First Trust Managed Future Strategy ETF | |||
BLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then STT could also see price increases.