BLMIF
Price
$17.85
Change
-$1.07 (-5.66%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.16B
BNCDY
Price
$32.91
Change
+$4.06 (+14.07%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
7.2B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMIF vs BNCDY

Header iconBLMIF vs BNCDY Comparison
Open Charts BLMIF vs BNCDYBanner chart's image
Bank Leumi Le Israel
Price$17.85
Change-$1.07 (-5.66%)
Volume$310
Capitalization12.16B
Banca Mediolanum SPA
Price$32.91
Change+$4.06 (+14.07%)
Volume$178
Capitalization7.2B
BLMIF vs BNCDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BNCDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMIF vs. BNCDY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMIF is a Hold and BNCDY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMIF: $17.85 vs. BNCDY: $32.91)
Brand notoriety: BLMIF and BNCDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMIF: 43% vs. BNCDY: 117%
Market capitalization -- BLMIF: $12.16B vs. BNCDY: $7.2B
BLMIF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.16B. BNCDY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBNCDY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BNCDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLMIF is a better buy in the long-term than BNCDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BNCDY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BNCDY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLMIF is a better buy in the short-term than BNCDY.

Price Growth

BLMIF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.89% price change this week, while BNCDY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNCDY is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMIF($12.2B) has a higher market cap than BNCDY($7.2B). BNCDY has higher P/E ratio than BLMIF: BNCDY (11.43) vs BLMIF (5.92). BLMIF (48.133) and BNCDY (45.900) have similar YTD gains . BNCDY has less debt than BLMIF: BNCDY (375M) vs BLMIF (28.3B). BLMIF has higher revenues than BNCDY: BLMIF (18.4B) vs BNCDY (1.55B).
BLMIFBNCDYBLMIF / BNCDY
Capitalization12.2B7.2B169%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD48.13345.900105%
P/E Ratio5.9211.4352%
Revenue18.4B1.55B1,186%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt28.3B375M7,547%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMIF vs BNCDY: Fundamental Ratings
BLMIF
BNCDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
138
SMR RATING
1..100
311
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1154
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMIF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCDY (95). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BNCDY’s over the last 12 months.

BNCDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMIF (13). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew similarly to BLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCDY (11). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BNCDY’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCDY (40). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to BNCDY’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNCDY (54). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNCDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMIFBNCDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BNCDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYHG64.880.10
+0.15%
ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hdgd
SCHH21.35N/A
N/A
Schwab US REIT ETF™
COMT26.27N/A
N/A
iShares GSCI Cmd Dyn Roll Stgy ETF
MYMG24.55N/A
N/A
SPDR SSGA My2027 Municipal Bond ETF
ZIG37.16-0.01
-0.03%
The Acquirers ETF

BLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMIF has been loosely correlated with CMBNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMIF jumps, then CMBNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMIF
1D Price
Change %
BLMIF100%
-5.66%
CMBNF - BLMIF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MBOF - BLMIF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BKHYY - BLMIF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KISB - BLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKV - BLMIF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
More

BNCDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNCDY and RSNHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNCDY and RSNHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCDY
1D Price
Change %
BNCDY100%
N/A
RSNHF - BNCDY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - BNCDY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDAB - BNCDY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
KMERF - BNCDY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLMIF - BNCDY
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
More