BLMIF
Price
$12.55
Change
-$0.35 (-2.71%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
12.16B
CMBNF
Price
$91.31
Change
+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
Ad is loading...

BLMIF vs CMBNF

Header iconBLMIF vs CMBNF Comparison
Open Charts BLMIF vs CMBNFBanner chart's image
Bank Leumi Le Israel
Price$12.55
Change-$0.35 (-2.71%)
Volume$200
Capitalization12.16B
CEMBRA MONEY BK AG
Price$91.31
Change+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Volume$170
Capitalization2.23B
BLMIF vs CMBNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMIF vs. CMBNF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMIF is a Hold and CMBNF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMIF: $12.55 vs. CMBNF: $91.31)
Brand notoriety: BLMIF and CMBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMIF: 15% vs. CMBNF: 25%
Market capitalization -- BLMIF: $12.16B vs. CMBNF: $2.23B
BLMIF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.16B. CMBNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMBNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMBNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLMIF is a better buy in the long-term than CMBNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMIF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BLMIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

BLMIF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.71% price change this week, while CMBNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMIF($12.2B) has a higher market cap than CMBNF($2.23B). CMBNF has higher P/E ratio than BLMIF: CMBNF (11.79) vs BLMIF (5.92). BLMIF YTD gains are higher at: 4.149 vs. CMBNF (0.000). CMBNF has less debt than BLMIF: CMBNF (3.1B) vs BLMIF (28.3B). BLMIF has higher revenues than CMBNF: BLMIF (18.4B) vs CMBNF (512M).
BLMIFCMBNFBLMIF / CMBNF
Capitalization12.2B2.23B548%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.1490.000-
P/E Ratio5.9211.7950%
Revenue18.4B512M3,594%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt28.3B3.1B913%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMIF: Fundamental Ratings
BLMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
3
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMIFCMBNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
32%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
32%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLPAX13.380.24
+1.83%
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity A
PFSZX24.990.25
+1.01%
PGIM Jennison Financial Services Z
CMLIX47.860.45
+0.95%
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
JEMOX30.840.17
+0.55%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R5
SLYCX14.840.08
+0.54%
SEI Large Cap Y (SIMT)

BLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMIF has been loosely correlated with CMBNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMIF jumps, then CMBNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMIF
1D Price
Change %
BLMIF100%
N/A
CMBNF - BLMIF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MBOF - BLMIF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BKHYY - BLMIF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KISB - BLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKV - BLMIF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More

CMBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBNF has been loosely correlated with BLMIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBNF jumps, then BLMIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBNF
1D Price
Change %
CMBNF100%
N/A
BLMIF - CMBNF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STBK - CMBNF
34%
Loosely correlated
-10.42%
CBWA - CMBNF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
CNBB - CMBNF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
ALBKY - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More