BLMIF
Price
$18.00
Change
-$0.77 (-4.10%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.16B
OAKV
Price
$13.85
Change
-$0.05 (-0.36%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
26.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMIF vs OAKV

Header iconBLMIF vs OAKV Comparison
Open Charts BLMIF vs OAKVBanner chart's image
Bank Leumi Le Israel
Price$18.00
Change-$0.77 (-4.10%)
Volume$100
Capitalization12.16B
OAK VIEW BANKSHARES
Price$13.85
Change-$0.05 (-0.36%)
Volume$20.65K
Capitalization26.01M
BLMIF vs OAKV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OAKV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMIF vs. OAKV commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMIF is a Hold and OAKV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMIF: $17.71 vs. OAKV: $13.79)
Brand notoriety: BLMIF and OAKV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMIF: 51% vs. OAKV: 78%
Market capitalization -- BLMIF: $12.16B vs. OAKV: $26.01M
BLMIF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.16B. OAKV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $26.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOAKV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OAKV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLMIF is a better buy in the long-term than OAKV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OAKV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OAKV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OAKV is a better buy in the short-term than BLMIF.

Price Growth

BLMIF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.13% price change this week, while OAKV (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMIF($12.2B) has a higher market cap than OAKV($26M). OAKV has higher P/E ratio than BLMIF: OAKV (12.58) vs BLMIF (5.92). BLMIF YTD gains are higher at: 49.378 vs. OAKV (-5.377). BLMIF has higher revenues than OAKV: BLMIF (18.4B) vs OAKV (9.28M).
BLMIFOAKVBLMIF / OAKV
Capitalization12.2B26M46,923%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD49.378-5.377-918%
P/E Ratio5.9212.5847%
Revenue18.4B9.28M198,319%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt28.3BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMIF vs OAKV: Fundamental Ratings
BLMIF
OAKV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9795
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
158
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1553
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OAKV's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMIF (79). This means that OAKV’s stock grew similarly to BLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

OAKV's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BLMIF (15). This means that OAKV’s stock grew similarly to BLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as OAKV (6). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to OAKV’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as OAKV (56). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew similarly to OAKV’s over the last 12 months.

BLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OAKV (53). This means that BLMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OAKV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMIFOAKV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
4%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OAKV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMBS45.000.03
+0.07%
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Sec ETF
XB39.43N/A
+0.01%
BondBloxx B Rated USD Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF
HJUL23.78N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - July
GJUL39.35-0.07
-0.18%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jul
WEBL28.73-0.91
-3.07%
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Int Bl 3X ETF

BLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMIF has been loosely correlated with CMBNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMIF jumps, then CMBNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMIF
1D Price
Change %
BLMIF100%
-4.13%
CMBNF - BLMIF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MBOF - BLMIF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
BKHYY - BLMIF
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.40%
KISB - BLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
OAKV - BLMIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OAKV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OAKV has been loosely correlated with MBOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OAKV jumps, then MBOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OAKV
1D Price
Change %
OAKV100%
N/A
MBOF - OAKV
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
RCBC - OAKV
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - OAKV
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLMIF - OAKV
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.13%
LLAZF - OAKV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More