BLMN
Price
$25.09
Change
+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Updated
May 2, 6:59 PM EST
5 days until earnings call
EAT
Price
$54.37
Change
-$0.59 (-1.07%)
Updated
May 2, 6:59 PM EST
103 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare trend and price BLMN vs EAT

Header iconBLMN vs EAT Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs EATBanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$25.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Volume$798.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Brinker International
Price$54.37
Change-$0.59 (-1.07%)
Volume$500.82K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BLMN vs EAT Comparison Chart

Loading...

BLMNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
EATDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BLMN vs. EAT commentary
May 03, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Hold and EAT is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 03, 2024
Stock price -- (BLMN: $25.04 vs. EAT: $54.95)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and EAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 120% vs. EAT: 176%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $2.18B vs. EAT: $2.44B
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.18B. EAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $197.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than BLMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the short-term than BLMN.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а -7.36% price change this week, while EAT (@Restaurants) price change was +15.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2024.

EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.27% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BLMN with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for EAT with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($2.45B) has a higher market cap than BLMN($2.18B). EAT has higher P/E ratio than BLMN: EAT (16.12) vs BLMN (9.78). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 27.258 vs. BLMN (-10.291).
BLMNEATBLMN / EAT
Capitalization2.18B2.45B89%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.29127.258-38%
P/E Ratio9.7816.1261%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.09B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs EAT: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5420
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5769
SMR RATING
1..100
168
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9484
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMN's Valuation (12) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (24). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (69). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (16). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (57). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (94). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLMNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
EATDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LNGZX34.080.09
+0.26%
Columbia Greater China Inst
MGORX32.200.03
+0.09%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp IR
RTXAX11.70-0.01
-0.09%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets A
MACSX12.68-0.02
-0.16%
Matthews Asian Growth & Inc Investor
HLIEX23.66-0.09
-0.38%
JPMorgan Equity Income I

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been closely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
-2.91%
CAKE - BLMN
70%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
DRI - BLMN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
CBRL - BLMN
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.14%
EAT - BLMN
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
CHUY - BLMN
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
More