BLMN
Price
$9.67
Change
+$1.06 (+12.31%)
Updated
Jul 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
733.23M
24 days until earnings call
EAT
Price
$183.91
Change
+$3.58 (+1.99%)
Updated
Jul 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.02B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMN vs EAT

Header iconBLMN vs EAT Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs EATBanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$9.67
Change+$1.06 (+12.31%)
Volume$151.74K
Capitalization733.23M
Brinker International
Price$183.91
Change+$3.58 (+1.99%)
Volume$20.96K
Capitalization8.02B
BLMN vs EAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMN vs. EAT commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Buy and EAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMN: $8.61 vs. EAT: $180.33)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and EAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 74% vs. EAT: 126%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $733.23M vs. EAT: $8.02B
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $733.23M. EAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $8.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than BLMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLMN is a better buy in the short-term than EAT.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.18% price change this week, while EAT (@Restaurants) price change was +0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.15% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($8.02B) has a higher market cap than BLMN($733M). EAT has higher P/E ratio than BLMN: EAT (25.08) vs BLMN (9.69). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 36.314 vs. BLMN (-27.031). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 637M vs. BLMN (303M). BLMN has more cash in the bank: 57.7M vs. EAT (17.5M). EAT has less debt than BLMN: EAT (1.72B) vs BLMN (2.18B). EAT has higher revenues than BLMN: EAT (5.13B) vs BLMN (3.93B).
BLMNEATBLMN / EAT
Capitalization733M8.02B9%
EBITDA303M637M48%
Gain YTD-27.03136.314-74%
P/E Ratio9.6925.0839%
Revenue3.93B5.13B77%
Total Cash57.7M17.5M330%
Total Debt2.18B1.72B127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs EAT: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6074
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10012
SMR RATING
1..100
9010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9835
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (66). This means that BLMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLMN (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLMN (90). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (58). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLMN (98). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PERP.X0.2329170.000065
+0.03%
Perpetual Protocol cryptocurrency
SC.X0.002936-0.000073
-2.42%
Siacoin cryptocurrency
ERN.X1.035781-0.038588
-3.59%
Ethos Reserve Note cryptocurrency
SAGA.X0.220624-0.010847
-4.69%
Saga cryptocurrency
TIA.X1.388934-0.146000
-9.51%
Celestia cryptocurrency

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
-0.58%
DIN - BLMN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
CBRL - BLMN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
CAKE - BLMN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
BJRI - BLMN
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
DRI - BLMN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More