BLMN
Price
$25.79
Change
-$1.06 (-3.95%)
Updated
Apr 30, 6:59 PM EST
7 days until earnings call
PZZA
Price
$61.69
Change
-$0.96 (-1.53%)
Updated
Apr 30, 6:59 PM EST
9 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions BLMN vs PZZA

Header iconBLMN vs PZZA Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs PZZABanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$25.79
Change-$1.06 (-3.95%)
Volume$918.17K
CapitalizationN/A
Papa John's International
Price$61.69
Change-$0.96 (-1.53%)
Volume$342.26K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BLMN vs PZZA Comparison Chart

Loading...

BLMNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
PZZADaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BLMN vs. PZZA commentary
May 01, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Hold and PZZA is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2024
Stock price -- (BLMN: $26.85 vs. PZZA: $62.65)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and PZZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 98% vs. PZZA: 58%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $2.25B vs. PZZA: $2.03B
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.25B. PZZA’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $196.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePZZA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PZZA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLMN is a better buy in the long-term than PZZA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PZZA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PZZA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PZZA is a better buy in the short-term than BLMN.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while PZZA (@Restaurants) price change was -0.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2024.

PZZA is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.87% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BLMN with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for PZZA with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMN($2.34B) has a higher market cap than PZZA($2.06B). PZZA has higher P/E ratio than BLMN: PZZA (25.26) vs BLMN (10.49). BLMN YTD gains are higher at: -3.807 vs. PZZA (-17.298).
BLMNPZZABLMN / PZZA
Capitalization2.34B2.06B113%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.807-17.29822%
P/E Ratio10.4925.2642%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs PZZA: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
PZZA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5914
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5472
SMR RATING
1..100
167
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5372
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9186
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PZZA's Valuation (11) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (12). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (72). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's SMR Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (16). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (72). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (91). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNPZZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLMNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
PZZADaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDURX13.840.22
+1.62%
PGIM Jennison Utility R
IBPIX15.230.05
+0.33%
Voya Balanced Port I
APPLX14.190.04
+0.28%
Appleseed Investor
AWPAX18.450.05
+0.27%
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
GSILX21.52N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps C

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been closely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
-0.30%
CAKE - BLMN
71%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
DRI - BLMN
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
EAT - BLMN
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
CBRL - BLMN
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
DIN - BLMN
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
More

PZZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZZA has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZZA jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PZZA
1D Price
Change %
PZZA100%
-0.71%
FRSH - PZZA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
RICK - PZZA
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
EAT - PZZA
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
BJRI - PZZA
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
CBRL - PZZA
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
More