Advertisement
BLMN vs TROW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Buy and TROW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTROW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BLMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TROW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TROW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TROW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а -4.96% price change this week, while TROW (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.06%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.
TROW is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-2.62% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
@Investment Managers (+2.05% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BLMN | TROW | BLMN / TROW | |
| Capitalization | 799M | 26.9B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 303M | 2.52B | 12% |
| Gain YTD | -20.421 | -7.063 | 289% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.55 | 15.51 | 68% |
| Revenue | 3.93B | 6.46B | 61% |
| Total Cash | 57.7M | 2.07B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 2.18B | 308M | 706% |
BLMN | TROW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLMN's Valuation (5) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TROW (30) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to TROW’s over the last 12 months.
TROW's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLMN (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that TROW’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.
TROW's SMR Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLMN (90) in the Restaurants industry. This means that TROW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.
BLMN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TROW (52) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to TROW’s over the last 12 months.
TROW's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLMN (97) in the Restaurants industry. This means that TROW’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.
| BLMN | TROW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
Advertisement
BLMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLMN | 100% | -4.18% | ||
| DIN - BLMN | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| CBRL - BLMN | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| CAKE - BLMN | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| BJRI - BLMN | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| DRI - BLMN | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
More | ||||
TROW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TROW has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TROW jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TROW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TROW | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| IVZ - TROW | 80% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| APAM - TROW | 80% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| SEIC - TROW | 79% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| JHG - TROW | 76% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| BN - TROW | 76% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||