Ad is loading...
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.33
Change-$0.09 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.53M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$52.60
Change-$0.49 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a StrongBuy and CSFZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. BLRAX (156M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.91) vs BLRAX (2.49). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSFZX (10 years). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.59 vs. CSFZX (7.75). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 1.87 vs. BLRAX (-7.26).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.883 | 3.036 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 1.79B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 2.91 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.59 | 7.75 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.15 | -5.89 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.26 | 1.87 | -388% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.44 | 35.75 | 29% |