Ad is loading...
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.03
Change-$0.23 (-2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.66M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a StrongBuy and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. BLRAX (153M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.79) vs BLRAX (2.15). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. CSFZX (6.64). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.66 vs. BLRAX (42.54).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.84 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.124 | 2.468 | 86% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 1.8B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 2.79 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.90 | 6.64 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.63 | -11.41 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.54 | 52.66 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.02 | 33.84 | 24% |