Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.97
Change-$0.04 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.32M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.54
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. BLRAX (119M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.82) vs BLRAX (2.26). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. CSFZX (-0.36). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 29.16 vs. BLRAX (26.82).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.84 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.972 | 10.578 | 94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119M | 2.06B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 2.82 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.34 | -0.36 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.70 | 19.39 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.82 | 29.16 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.93 | 57.09 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement