Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.3M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.06
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. BLRAX (116M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.84) vs BLRAX (2.08). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (14 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. CSFZX (3.85). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.89 vs. BLRAX (15.83).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.84 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.802 | 9.622 | 102% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 2.06B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 2.84 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.25 | 3.85 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.10 | 21.36 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.83 | 19.89 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.25 | 49.07 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement