Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.44M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$53.98
Change+$0.20 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. BLRAX (110M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.89) vs BLRAX (2.32). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.38 vs. CSFZX (8.69). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 34.87 vs. BLRAX (25.58).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.84 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.302 | 7.472 | 71% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110M | 2.01B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 2.89 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.38 | 8.69 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.16 | 12.82 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.58 | 34.87 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.68 | 46.95 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement