Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.90
Change+$0.10 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.31M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.12
Change+$0.40 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. BLRAX (117M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.80) vs BLRAX (2.07). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.30 vs. CSFZX (0.08). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.39 vs. BLRAX (24.19).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.84 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.606 | 8.945 | 96% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 2.08B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 2.80 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.30 | 0.08 | 1,736% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.32 | 35.63 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.19 | 26.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.53 | 46.45 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement