Ad is loading...
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.63M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. BLRAX (153M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.91) vs BLRAX (2.49). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSFZX (10 years). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX (6.24) and CSFZX (6.04) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. BLRAX (-8.82).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.090 | 0.509 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 1.75B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 2.91 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 6.04 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.74 | -12.34 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.82 | 2.34 | -377% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.88 | 34.75 | 26% |