Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFZX
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFZX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.95M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.44
Change+$0.07 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
BLRAX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFZX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Buy and CSFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. BLRAX (118M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFZX (2.93) vs BLRAX (2.38). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFZX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. CSFZX (2.65). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 27.36 vs. BLRAX (22.92).
| BLRAX | CSFZX | BLRAX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.84 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.84 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.606 | 10.240 | 94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118M | 1.98B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 2.93 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.29 | 2.65 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.28 | 14.03 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.92 | 27.36 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.90 | 62.75 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers