Ad is loading...
BLRAX vs CSSPX
BLRAX vs CSSPX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSSPX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.23
Change+$0.06 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.94M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$52.01
Change+$0.26 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
BLRAX vs CSSPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSSPX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Buy and CSSPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. BLRAX (124M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSSPX (2.74) vs BLRAX (2.15). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSSPX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSSPX (28 years). BLRAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.92). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSSPX (52.00). BLRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: BLRAX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. CSSPX (9.31). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.88 vs. BLRAX (28.35).
| BLRAX | CSSPX | BLRAX / CSSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.92 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.308 | 1.900 | 69% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 124M | 1.91B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 2.74 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | 9.31 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.88 | -10.19 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.35 | 38.88 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.23 | 33.06 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...