Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSSPX
BLRAX vs CSSPX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSSPX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
Price$11.74
Change+$0.07 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.02M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.49
Change+$0.25 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
BLRAX vs CSSPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSSPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Buy and CSSPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. BLRAX (112M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSSPX (2.62) vs BLRAX (2.06). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSSPX: BLRAX (13 years) vs CSSPX (28 years). BLRAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). BLRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: BLRAX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.27 vs. CSSPX (8.35). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 24.04 vs. BLRAX (15.70).
| BLRAX | CSSPX | BLRAX / CSSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.93 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.842 | 6.270 | 93% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112M | 1.94B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 2.62 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.27 | 8.35 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.48 | 3.01 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.70 | 24.04 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.08 | 46.56 | 43% |