Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSSPX
BLRCX vs CSSPX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSSPX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$11.84
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.34M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$55.39
Change+$0.51 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
BLRCX vs CSSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSSPX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Buy and CSSPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. BLRCX (117M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSSPX (2.77) vs BLRCX (1.55). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSSPX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSSPX (28 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). BLRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: BLRCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.99 vs. BLRCX (-1.12). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 32.47 vs. BLRCX (25.67).
| BLRCX | CSSPX | BLRCX / CSSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.90 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.93 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.656 | 10.269 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 2.06B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 2.77 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.12 | -0.99 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.57 | 32.53 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.67 | 32.47 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.35 | 57.73 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement