Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSSPX
BLRCX vs CSSPX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSSPX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$11.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets115.9M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.29
Change+$0.16 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
BLRCX vs CSSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSSPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Buy and CSSPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. BLRCX (116M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSSPX (2.87) vs BLRCX (1.63). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSSPX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSSPX (28 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). BLRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: BLRCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.63 vs. BLRCX (3.02). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 27.81 vs. BLRCX (17.50).
| BLRCX | CSSPX | BLRCX / CSSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.90 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.93 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.915 | 8.079 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 1.98B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 2.87 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.02 | 3.63 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.40 | 3.19 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.50 | 27.81 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.78 | 44.11 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement