Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRCX vs CSSPX
BLRCX vs CSSPX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSSPX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$12.16
Change+$0.07 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.09M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$56.53
Change+$0.25 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
BLRCX vs CSSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSSPX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Hold and CSSPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. BLRCX (119M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSSPX (2.74) vs BLRCX (1.17). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSSPX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSSPX (28 years). BLRCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). BLRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: BLRCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.95 vs. BLRCX (3.71). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 31.27 vs. BLRCX (24.02).
| BLRCX | CSSPX | BLRCX / CSSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.90 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.93 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.950 | 12.539 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119M | 2.08B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 2.74 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.71 | 3.95 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 36.70 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.02 | 31.27 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.64 | 49.22 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement