Ad is loading...
BLRCX vs CSSPX
BLRCX vs CSSPX Comparison
Open Charts BLRCX vs CSSPX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
Price$10.62
Change+$0.16 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.93M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$49.70
Change+$0.83 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
BLRCX vs CSSPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRCX vs. CSSPX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRCX is a Hold and CSSPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. BLRCX (117M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than BLRCX: CSSPX (2.74) vs BLRCX (1.41). BLRCX was incepted earlier than CSSPX: BLRCX (13 years) vs CSSPX (28 years). BLRCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.92). BLRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSSPX (52.00). BLRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: BLRCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). BLRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.21 vs. CSSPX (0.70). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 21.69 vs. BLRCX (9.43).
| BLRCX | CSSPX | BLRCX / CSSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.90 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.92 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.881 | -4.252 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 1.91B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 2.74 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.21 | 0.70 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.33 | -15.82 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.43 | 21.69 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.12 | 25.68 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...