Advertisement
BLRDF vs CFPUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRDF is a Hold and CFPUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLRDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCFPUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BLRDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CFPUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLRDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFPUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLRDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
- CFPUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BLRDF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CFPUF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +23.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.05%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pulp & Paper (-1.30% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
| BLRDF | CFPUF | BLRDF / CFPUF | |
| Capitalization | 2.31B | 15.8M | 14,646% |
| EBITDA | 4.92B | -153.8M | -3,200% |
| Gain YTD | -0.546 | -44.890 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.67 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 42.7B | 730M | 5,849% |
| Total Cash | 1.66B | 1.3M | 127,846% |
| Total Debt | 7.22B | 76.6M | 9,427% |
BLRDF | CFPUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLRDF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFPUF (68). This means that BLRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.
BLRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPUF (100). This means that BLRDF’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.
BLRDF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPUF (96). This means that BLRDF’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.
BLRDF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFPUF (90). This means that BLRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.
BLRDF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPUF (98). This means that BLRDF’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.
| BLRDF | CFPUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 37% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 36% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
BLRDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BLRDF and MERC have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLRDF and MERC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLRDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLRDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MERC - BLRDF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| CFPUF - BLRDF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ITP - BLRDF | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.63% | ||
| LMPMF - BLRDF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BLRDY - BLRDF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CFPUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CFPUF and ITP have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFPUF and ITP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFPUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFPUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ITP - CFPUF | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.63% | ||
| SUZ - CFPUF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| BLRDF - CFPUF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MERC - CFPUF | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| KLBAY - CFPUF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||