Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLSCX vs RNWFX
BLSCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BLSCX vs RNWFX
BlackRock Advantage Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$11.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.48M
American Funds New World R5
Price$95.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
BLSCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLSCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLSCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. BLSCX (53.5M). BLSCX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: BLSCX (3.79) vs RNWFX (1.01). BLSCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: BLSCX (14 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). BLSCX (2.59) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). BLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 274.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLSCX: RNWFX (250) vs BLSCX (1000). BLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.51 vs. RNWFX (17.17). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.52 vs. BLSCX (20.95).
| BLSCX | RNWFX | BLSCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.59 | 0.62 | 418% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.950 | 23.557 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.5M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 1.01 | 374% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.51 | 17.17 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.59 | 50.26 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.95 | 32.52 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.73 | 98.91 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement