Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLSCX vs RNWFX
BLSCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BLSCX vs RNWFX
BlackRock Advantage Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$11.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.63M
American Funds New World R5
Price$96.39
Change+$0.84 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.59B
BLSCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLSCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLSCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 73.6B vs. BLSCX (54.6M). BLSCX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: BLSCX (3.47) vs RNWFX (0.95). BLSCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: BLSCX (14 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). BLSCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). BLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 274.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLSCX: RNWFX (250) vs BLSCX (1000). BLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.63 vs. RNWFX (19.41). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.23 vs. BLSCX (9.64).
| BLSCX | RNWFX | BLSCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 0.62 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.839 | 24.761 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.6M | 73.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 0.95 | 367% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.63 | 19.41 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.11 | 46.29 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.64 | 20.23 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.67 | 93.58 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement