Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLSCX vs RNWHX
BLSCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BLSCX vs RNWHX
BlackRock Advantage Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$11.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.48M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$93.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
BLSCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLSCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLSCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. BLSCX (53.5M). BLSCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BLSCX (3.79) vs RNWHX (0.97). BLSCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BLSCX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BLSCX (2.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). BLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 274.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLSCX: RNWHX (250) vs BLSCX (1000). BLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.51 vs. RNWHX (17.01). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. BLSCX (20.95).
| BLSCX | RNWHX | BLSCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.72 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.59 | 0.72 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.950 | 23.481 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.5M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 0.97 | 392% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.51 | 17.01 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.59 | 49.85 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.95 | 31.85 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement