BLSFY
Price
$65.29
Change
+$4.68 (+7.72%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.53B
CMC
Price
$50.60
Change
-$0.28 (-0.55%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.75B
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLSFY vs CMC

Header iconBLSFY vs CMC Comparison
Open Charts BLSFY vs CMCBanner chart's image
Bluescope Steel
Price$65.29
Change+$4.68 (+7.72%)
Volume$232
Capitalization5.53B
Commercial Metals
Price$50.60
Change-$0.28 (-0.55%)
Volume$739.23K
Capitalization5.75B
BLSFY vs CMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLSFY vs. CMC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLSFY is a Hold and CMC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BLSFY: $65.29 vs. CMC: $50.60)
Brand notoriety: BLSFY and CMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLSFY: 24% vs. CMC: 75%
Market capitalization -- BLSFY: $5.53B vs. CMC: $5.75B
BLSFY [@Steel] is valued at $5.53B. CMC’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $5.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $29.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLSFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BLSFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMC is a better buy in the long-term than BLSFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLSFY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLSFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMC is a better buy in the short-term than BLSFY.

Price Growth

BLSFY (@Steel) experienced а +13.08% price change this week, while CMC (@Steel) price change was +8.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMC is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+1.98% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMC($5.75B) and BLSFY($5.54B) have the same market capitalization . CMC has higher P/E ratio than BLSFY: CMC (45.59) vs BLSFY (11.78). BLSFY YTD gains are higher at: 7.650 vs. CMC (2.373). BLSFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.99B vs. CMC (509M). BLSFY has higher revenues than CMC: BLSFY (17B) vs CMC (7.83B).
BLSFYCMCBLSFY / CMC
Capitalization5.54B5.75B96%
EBITDA1.99B509M392%
Gain YTD7.6502.373322%
P/E Ratio11.7845.5926%
Revenue17B7.83B217%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.19B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLSFY vs CMC: Fundamental Ratings
BLSFY
CMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5010
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5016
SMR RATING
1..100
8192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
702
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLSFY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CMC (17) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLSFY (50) in the null industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLSFY’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CMC (92) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as BLSFY (60) in the null industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew similarly to BLSFY’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLSFY (70) in the null industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew significantly faster than BLSFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLSFYCMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEMIX23.970.24
+1.01%
Franklin Mutual International Value A
PRCOX59.670.59
+1.00%
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research
SDGCX84.980.78
+0.93%
DWS Capital Growth C
GCPCX19.890.13
+0.66%
Gateway Equity Call Premium C
ARRFX13.290.02
+0.15%
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N

BLSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLSFY and CLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLSFY and CLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLSFY
1D Price
Change %
BLSFY100%
+7.73%
CLF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
FEEXF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LIFZF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
NUE - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
CMC - BLSFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
More