BLSFY
Price
$74.05
Change
+$2.15 (+2.99%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
6.37B
CMC
Price
$44.87
Change
+$1.65 (+3.82%)
Updated
Mar 11 closing price
Capitalization
5.1B
8 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLSFY vs CMC

Header iconBLSFY vs CMC Comparison
Open Charts BLSFY vs CMCBanner chart's image
Bluescope Steel
Price$74.05
Change+$2.15 (+2.99%)
Volume$10.07K
Capitalization6.37B
Commercial Metals
Price$44.87
Change+$1.65 (+3.82%)
Volume$1.47M
Capitalization5.1B
BLSFY vs CMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLSFY vs. CMC commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLSFY is a Hold and CMC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BLSFY: $74.05 vs. CMC: $44.87)
Brand notoriety: BLSFY and CMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLSFY: 825% vs. CMC: 126%
Market capitalization -- BLSFY: $6.37B vs. CMC: $5.1B
BLSFY [@Steel] is valued at $6.37B. CMC’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $5.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $29.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLSFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BLSFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BLSFY and CMC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BLSFY (@Steel) experienced а -4.33% price change this week, while CMC (@Steel) price change was -0.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMC is expected to report earnings on Jun 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.54% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLSFY($6.37B) has a higher market cap than CMC($5.1B). CMC has higher P/E ratio than BLSFY: CMC (40.42) vs BLSFY (19.30). BLSFY YTD gains are higher at: 23.597 vs. CMC (-9.220). BLSFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. CMC (509M). BLSFY has higher revenues than CMC: BLSFY (8.63B) vs CMC (7.83B).
BLSFYCMCBLSFY / CMC
Capitalization6.37B5.1B125%
EBITDA1.05B509M207%
Gain YTD23.597-9.220-256%
P/E Ratio19.3040.4248%
Revenue8.63B7.83B110%
Total CashN/A856M-
Total DebtN/A1.19B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLSFY vs CMC: Fundamental Ratings
BLSFY
CMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2563
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3725
SMR RATING
1..100
7782
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8896
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
142
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLSFY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CMC (15) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as BLSFY (37) in the null industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew similarly to BLSFY’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as CMC (82) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's Price Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CMC (96) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as BLSFY (14) in the null industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew similarly to BLSFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLY27.760.10
+0.34%
SPDR® SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
IFRA45.020.07
+0.16%
iShares US Infrastructure ETF
SPMV47.07N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
PAWZ51.99-0.56
-1.07%
ProShares Pet Care ETF
DEUS52.85-0.65
-1.21%
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF

BLSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLSFY and CLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLSFY and CLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLSFY
1D Price
Change %
BLSFY100%
N/A
CLF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-10.81%
FEEXF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LIFZF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
NUE - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.25%
CMC - BLSFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
More