BLSFY
Price
$75.00
Change
-$0.50 (-0.66%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.58B
LIFZF
Price
$19.69
Change
+$0.17 (+0.87%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLSFY vs LIFZF

Header iconBLSFY vs LIFZF Comparison
Open Charts BLSFY vs LIFZFBanner chart's image
Bluescope Steel
Price$75.00
Change-$0.50 (-0.66%)
Volume$524
Capitalization6.58B
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
Price$19.69
Change+$0.17 (+0.87%)
Volume$18.47K
Capitalization1.26B
BLSFY vs LIFZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLSFY vs. LIFZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLSFY is a Hold and LIFZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLSFY: $75.00 vs. LIFZF: $19.69)
Brand notoriety: BLSFY and LIFZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLSFY: 20% vs. LIFZF: 71%
Market capitalization -- BLSFY: $6.58B vs. LIFZF: $1.26B
BLSFY [@Steel] is valued at $6.58B. LIFZF’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $33.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLSFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLIFZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLSFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LIFZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BLSFY and LIFZF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLSFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIFZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLSFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LIFZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIFZF is a better buy in the short-term than BLSFY.

Price Growth

BLSFY (@Steel) experienced а +3.62% price change this week, while LIFZF (@Steel) price change was +1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+2.71% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLSFY($6.58B) has a higher market cap than LIFZF($1.26B). BLSFY has higher P/E ratio than LIFZF: BLSFY (143.60) vs LIFZF (15.34). BLSFY YTD gains are higher at: 26.729 vs. LIFZF (-2.093). BLSFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 994M vs. LIFZF (142M). BLSFY has more cash in the bank: 858M vs. LIFZF (4.76M). BLSFY has higher revenues than LIFZF: BLSFY (16.3B) vs LIFZF (181M).
BLSFYLIFZFBLSFY / LIFZF
Capitalization6.58B1.26B521%
EBITDA994M142M700%
Gain YTD26.729-2.093-1,277%
P/E Ratio143.6015.34936%
Revenue16.3B181M9,006%
Total Cash858M4.76M18,025%
Total Debt886MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLSFY vs LIFZF: Fundamental Ratings
BLSFY
LIFZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
564
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
9350
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
112
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LIFZF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BLSFY (13). This means that LIFZF’s stock grew similarly to BLSFY’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIFZF (100). This means that BLSFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

LIFZF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLSFY (93). This means that LIFZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLSFY’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as LIFZF (62). This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as LIFZF (12). This means that BLSFY’s stock grew similarly to LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLSFYLIFZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOCT46.480.27
+0.59%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Oct
CORO29.150.12
+0.43%
iShares International Country Rot ActETF
DEEF34.48N/A
N/A
Xtrackers FTSE Develop ex US Mulfact ETF
CADCNY5.18N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - China Yuan
THD58.35-0.33
-0.56%
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF

BLSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLSFY and CLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLSFY and CLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLSFY
1D Price
Change %
BLSFY100%
-0.66%
CLF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
FEEXF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.72%
LIFZF - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
NUE - BLSFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
CMC - BLSFY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
More

LIFZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIFZF has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIFZF jumps, then MT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIFZF
1D Price
Change %
LIFZF100%
+0.86%
MT - LIFZF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
SID - LIFZF
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
TX - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
CLF - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
MSB - LIFZF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
More