BLTMF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
PNGZF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

BLTMF vs PNGZF

Header iconBLTMF vs PNGZF Comparison
Open Charts BLTMF vs PNGZFBanner chart's image
Orbec Gold Mines
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$25K
CapitalizationN/A
GCX Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
BLTMF vs PNGZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLTMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLTMF vs. PNGZF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLTMF is a Buy and PNGZF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BLTMF: $0.04 vs. PNGZF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: BLTMF and PNGZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLTMF: 216% vs. PNGZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BLTMF: $1.3M vs. PNGZF: $21.93M
BLTMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.3M. PNGZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $21.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLTMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNGZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLTMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PNGZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNGZF is a better buy in the long-term than BLTMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLTMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BLTMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BLTMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PNGZF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNGZF($21.9M) has a higher market cap than BLTMF($1.3M). PNGZF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BLTMF (-36.066). BLTMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.38M vs. PNGZF (-11.18M). PNGZF has more cash in the bank: 12M vs. BLTMF (490K). BLTMF (0) and PNGZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BLTMFPNGZFBLTMF / PNGZF
Capitalization1.3M21.9M6%
EBITDA-2.38M-11.18M21%
Gain YTD-36.0660.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash490K12M4%
Total DebtN/A58.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNGZF: Fundamental Ratings
PNGZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLTMFPNGZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLTMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBDQ25.08N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corp ETF
RFEU60.43N/A
N/A
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Eurp ETF
MMIN24.12-0.05
-0.21%
NYLI MacKay Muni Insured ETF
OVT22.42-0.05
-0.23%
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
GDMA32.44-0.08
-0.26%
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF

BLTMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLTMF has been loosely correlated with PNGZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLTMF jumps, then PNGZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLTMF
1D Price
Change %
BLTMF100%
N/A
PNGZF - BLTMF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NCAUF - BLTMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.94%
HGMCF - BLTMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRGGF - BLTMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-22.79%
ECRTF - BLTMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PNGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNGZF has been loosely correlated with BLTMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PNGZF jumps, then BLTMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNGZF
1D Price
Change %
PNGZF100%
N/A
BLTMF - PNGZF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GGLXF - PNGZF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VGMIF - PNGZF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRGGF - PNGZF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRCAF - PNGZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More