Ad is loading...
BLYQ
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
PPYAU
Price
$11.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 31 closing price
Ad is loading...

BLYQ vs PPYAU

Header iconBLYQ vs PPYAU Comparison
Open Charts BLYQ vs PPYAUBanner chart's image
Bally
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$323
CapitalizationN/A
Papaya Growth Opportunity
Price$11.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BLYQ vs PPYAU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLYQ vs. PPYAU commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLYQ is a Hold and PPYAU is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BLYQ: $0.06 vs. PPYAU: $11.19)
Brand notoriety: BLYQ and PPYAU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLYQ: 109% vs. PPYAU: 78%
Market capitalization -- BLYQ: $17.14M vs. PPYAU: $0
BLYQ [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $17.14M. PPYAU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLYQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePPYAU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLYQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PPYAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PPYAU is a better buy in the long-term than BLYQ.

Price Growth

BLYQ (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PPYAU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.58% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PPYAU YTD gains are higher at: 4.093 vs. BLYQ (-94.059). BLYQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -43.83K vs. PPYAU (-2.29M). PPYAU has more cash in the bank: 2.92K vs. BLYQ (0). BLYQ has less debt than PPYAU: BLYQ (136K) vs PPYAU (2.34M). BLYQ (0) and PPYAU (0) have equivalent revenues.
BLYQPPYAUBLYQ / PPYAU
Capitalization17.1MN/A-
EBITDA-43.83K-2.29M2%
Gain YTD-94.0594.093-2,298%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash02.92K-
Total Debt136K2.34M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLYQ: Fundamental Ratings
BLYQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSFP31.73N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF
IGLB50.57-0.04
-0.08%
iShares 10+ Year Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
NUDM31.30-0.15
-0.48%
Nuveen ESG Intl Dev Mkts Eq ETF
TFPN24.85-0.27
-1.07%
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asst Trnd ETF
WEIX26.71-0.48
-1.77%
Dynamic Short Short-Term Volatil Fut ETF

BLYQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLYQ and IHAI have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLYQ and IHAI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLYQ
1D Price
Change %
BLYQ100%
N/A
IHAI - BLYQ
26%
Poorly correlated
-13.04%
INAQ - BLYQ
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPYAU - BLYQ
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAIAU - BLYQ
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATEK - BLYQ
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
More

PPYAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PPYAU has been loosely correlated with WAVSU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PPYAU jumps, then WAVSU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PPYAU
1D Price
Change %
PPYAU100%
N/A
WAVSU - PPYAU
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IGTAU - PPYAU
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ADRT - PPYAU
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALSAU - PPYAU
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GODNU - PPYAU
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
More