Ad is loading...
BMA
Price
$80.04
Change
+$1.00 (+1.27%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
3 days until earnings call
SBNY
Price
$1.32
Change
+$0.04 (+3.12%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BMA vs SBNY

Header iconBMA vs SBNY Comparison
Open Charts BMA vs SBNYBanner chart's image
Banco Macro SA
Price$80.04
Change+$1.00 (+1.27%)
Volume$420.01K
CapitalizationN/A
Signature Bank (New York, NY)
Price$1.32
Change+$0.04 (+3.12%)
Volume$97.62K
CapitalizationN/A
BMA vs SBNY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMA vs. SBNY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMA is a StrongSell and SBNY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BMA: $80.04 vs. SBNY: $1.32)
Brand notoriety: BMA and SBNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMA: 163% vs. SBNY: 133%
Market capitalization -- BMA: $3.14B vs. SBNY: $3.15M
BMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.14B. SBNY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBNY is a better buy in the long-term than BMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBNY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBNY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BMA and SBNY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.02% price change this week, while SBNY (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

SBNY is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMA($3.14B) has a higher market cap than SBNY($3.15M). BMA has higher P/E ratio than SBNY: BMA (89.76) vs SBNY (0.00). BMA YTD gains are higher at: 212.506 vs. SBNY (-17.546). BMA has higher revenues than SBNY: BMA (573B) vs SBNY (2.7B).
BMASBNYBMA / SBNY
Capitalization3.14B3.15M99,778%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD212.506-17.546-1,211%
P/E Ratio89.760.004,657,923%
Revenue573B2.7B21,254%
Total CashN/A11.3B-
Total DebtN/A2.31B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMA vs SBNY: Fundamental Ratings
BMA
SBNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
1008
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9696
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBNY's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMA (57). This means that SBNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBNY (100). This means that BMA’s stock grew significantly faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMA (100). This means that SBNY’s stock grew significantly faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BMA (35). This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to BMA’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BMA (96). This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to BMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMASBNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSSIX30.780.02
+0.07%
SouthernSun Small Cap, I
FLPSX43.75-0.27
-0.61%
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
SBACX28.17-0.29
-1.02%
Touchstone Balanced C
LFGIX35.35-0.58
-1.61%
Lord Abbett Focused Growth I
JSLNX19.76-0.34
-1.69%
Janus Henderson Global Select N

BMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMA has been closely correlated with GGAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BMA jumps, then GGAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMA
1D Price
Change %
BMA100%
+1.27%
GGAL - BMA
90%
Closely correlated
+2.89%
BBAR - BMA
89%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
SUPV - BMA
86%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
SBNY - BMA
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
NU - BMA
30%
Poorly correlated
-7.44%
More

SBNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBNY has been closely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBNY jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBNY
1D Price
Change %
SBNY100%
+3.13%
WAL - SBNY
84%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
FITB - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
SNV - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
OZK - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
BKU - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
More