BMA
Price
$43.55
Change
+$0.47 (+1.09%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.88B
43 days until earnings call
SBNY
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.03 (-4.41%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
72.42M
14 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMA vs SBNY

Header iconBMA vs SBNY Comparison
Open Charts BMA vs SBNYBanner chart's image
Banco Macro SA
Price$43.55
Change+$0.47 (+1.09%)
Volume$483.5K
Capitalization2.88B
Signature Bank (New York, NY)
Price$0.65
Change-$0.03 (-4.41%)
Volume$2.68K
Capitalization72.42M
BMA vs SBNY Comparison Chart in %
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMA vs. SBNY commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMA is a StrongBuy and SBNY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BMA: $43.55 vs. SBNY: $0.65)
Brand notoriety: BMA and SBNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMA: 77% vs. SBNY: 3%
Market capitalization -- BMA: $2.88B vs. SBNY: $72.42M
BMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.88B. SBNY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $72.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the long-term than SBNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBNY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the short-term than SBNY.

Price Growth

BMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.64% price change this week, while SBNY (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

SBNY is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.48% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMA($2.88B) has a higher market cap than SBNY($72.4M). BMA has higher P/E ratio than SBNY: BMA (10.45) vs SBNY (0.06). SBNY (-52.555) and BMA (-54.061) have similar YTD gains . BMA has higher revenues than SBNY: BMA (3.16T) vs SBNY (2.7B).
BMASBNYBMA / SBNY
Capitalization2.88B72.4M3,975%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-54.061-52.555103%
P/E Ratio10.450.0618,864%
Revenue3.16T2.7B117,248%
Total CashN/A5.88B-
Total DebtN/A12.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMA vs SBNY: Fundamental Ratings
BMA
SBNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6074
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71100
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBNY's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMA (43). This means that SBNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBNY (100). This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBNY (9). This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMA (93). This means that SBNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBNY (98). This means that BMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMASBNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBRRF11.99N/A
N/A
Chain Bridge I
PSMMF13.98N/A
N/A
Persimmon Plc
SMSZF8.56N/A
N/A
SMS Co., Ltd.
SWSDF1041.95N/A
N/A
Swiss Life Holding
SGTM0.05N/A
-7.24%
Sustainable Green Team, Ltd.

BMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMA has been closely correlated with GGAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BMA jumps, then GGAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMA
1D Price
Change %
BMA100%
+1.09%
GGAL - BMA
94%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
SUPV - BMA
94%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
BBAR - BMA
93%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
BSAC - BMA
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
SBNY - BMA
38%
Loosely correlated
-4.41%
More

SBNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBNY has been closely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBNY jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBNY
1D Price
Change %
SBNY100%
-4.41%
WAL - SBNY
84%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
FITB - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
SNV - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
OZK - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
BKU - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
More