Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMBCX vs FSKKX
BMBCX vs FSKKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMBCX vs. FSKKX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBCX is a Hold and FSKKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMBCX has more cash in the bank: 7.93B vs. FSKKX (524M). FSKKX pays higher dividends than BMBCX: FSKKX (5.58) vs BMBCX (3.07). BMBCX was incepted earlier than FSKKX: BMBCX (10 years) vs FSKKX (12 years). FSKKX (3.00) is less costly to investors than BMBCX (1.89). FSKKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BMBCX (242.00). BMBCX (1000) and FSKKX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSKKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.36 vs. BMBCX (1.15). BMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 12.41 vs. FSKKX (5.74).
| BMBCX | FSKKX | BMBCX / FSKKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.69 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 3.00 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.398 | 4.587 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.93B | 524M | 1,514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 5.58 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.15 | 3.36 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.45 | 10.55 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.41 | 5.74 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.61 | 14.49 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement