Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMBCX vs FSKKX
BMBCX vs FSKKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMBCX vs. FSKKX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBCX is a Hold and FSKKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMBCX has more cash in the bank: 8.03B vs. FSKKX (530M). FSKKX pays higher dividends than BMBCX: FSKKX (5.39) vs BMBCX (3.05). BMBCX was incepted earlier than FSKKX: BMBCX (11 years) vs FSKKX (12 years). FSKKX (2.97) is less costly to investors than BMBCX (1.89). FSKKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BMBCX (242.00). BMBCX (1000) and FSKKX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSKKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.17 vs. BMBCX (2.13). BMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.86 vs. FSKKX (5.00).
| BMBCX | FSKKX | BMBCX / FSKKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.68 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.97 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.797 | 7.057 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03B | 530M | 1,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 5.39 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.13 | 3.17 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.76 | 15.13 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.86 | 5.00 | 297% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.61 | 17.63 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement