Advertisement
BMBLF vs BXBLY
To understand the difference between Brambles Ltd (BMBLF) vs. Brambles Ltd - ADR (BXBLY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BMBLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBXBLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BMBLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BXBLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BMBLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BXBLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BMBLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- BXBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BMBLF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +16.54% price change this week, while BXBLY (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -0.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
BXBLY is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.31% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| BMBLF | BXBLY | BMBLF / BXBLY | |
| Capitalization | 20.8B | 20.8B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 2.12B | 2.12B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 27.510 | 27.610 | 100% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.92 | 25.27 | 99% |
| Revenue | 6.64B | 6.64B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 113M | 77.3M | 146% |
| Total Debt | 2.64B | 2.64B | 100% |
BMBLF | BXBLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 41 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BMBLF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BXBLY (37). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew similarly to BXBLY’s over the last 12 months.
BXBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMBLF (51). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMBLF’s over the last 12 months.
BXBLY's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBLF (64). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew similarly to BMBLF’s over the last 12 months.
BXBLY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBLF (47). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew similarly to BMBLF’s over the last 12 months.
BXBLY's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBLF (30). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew similarly to BMBLF’s over the last 12 months.
| BMBLF | BXBLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 48% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 63% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OZEM | 25.23 | 0.64 | +2.62% |
| Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF | |||
| WIA | 8.37 | 0.02 | +0.24% |
| Western Asset Inflation-Linked Income Fund | |||
| ITDC | 32.97 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF | |||
| PFEB | 38.92 | -0.04 | -0.10% |
| Innovator US Equity Power Bffr ETF™ Feb | |||
| SCHX | 25.47 | -0.06 | -0.24% |
| Schwab US Large-Cap ETF™ | |||
BMBLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBLF and SECUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBLF and SECUF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMBLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMBLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SECUF - BMBLF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCGPY - BMBLF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EXPGF - BMBLF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GECSF - BMBLF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BXBLY - BMBLF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
More | ||||
BXBLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXBLY has been loosely correlated with ALLE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXBLY jumps, then ALLE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BXBLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BXBLY | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| ALLE - BXBLY | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| BCO - BXBLY | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| ASAZY - BXBLY | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BV - BXBLY | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
| CTAS - BXBLY | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||