Advertisement
BMBLF vs GECSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBLF is a Hold and GECSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BMBLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGECSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BMBLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GECSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BMBLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GECSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BMBLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GECSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
BMBLF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +16.54% price change this week, while GECSF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was -3.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.39%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.31% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.60% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| BMBLF | GECSF | BMBLF / GECSF | |
| Capitalization | 20.8B | 19.6M | 106,122% |
| EBITDA | 2.12B | -19.76M | -10,710% |
| Gain YTD | 27.510 | 49.662 | 55% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.92 | 10.73 | 232% |
| Revenue | 6.64B | 70.3M | 9,438% |
| Total Cash | 113M | 1.09M | 10,357% |
| Total Debt | 2.64B | 231M | 1,143% |
BMBLF | GECSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 41 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BMBLF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GECSF (67). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew similarly to GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
BMBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GECSF (100). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
BMBLF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as GECSF (93). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew similarly to GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
BMBLF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GECSF (55). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew similarly to GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
BMBLF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GECSF (98). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew significantly faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.
| BMBLF | GECSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 48% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 53% |
Advertisement
BMBLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBLF and SECUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBLF and SECUF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMBLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMBLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SECUF - BMBLF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCGPY - BMBLF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EXPGF - BMBLF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GECSF - BMBLF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BXBLY - BMBLF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
More | ||||
GECSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GECSF and BMBLF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GECSF and BMBLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GECSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GECSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BMBLF - GECSF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CBZ - GECSF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| SCGPY - GECSF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VCIG - GECSF | 12% Poorly correlated | -5.12% | ||
| AERT - GECSF | 1% Poorly correlated | -9.09% | ||
More | ||||