BMBLF
Price
$15.73
Change
+$0.46 (+3.01%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
13.12B
SCGPY
Price
$2.74
Change
-$0.10 (-3.52%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMBLF vs SCGPY

Header iconBMBLF vs SCGPY Comparison
Open Charts BMBLF vs SCGPYBanner chart's image
Brambles
Price$15.73
Change+$0.46 (+3.01%)
Volume$757
Capitalization13.12B
Serco Group
Price$2.74
Change-$0.10 (-3.52%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization2.2B
BMBLF vs SCGPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMBLF vs. SCGPY commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBLF is a Hold and SCGPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BMBLF: $14.73 vs. SCGPY: $2.74)
Brand notoriety: BMBLF and SCGPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMBLF: 10% vs. SCGPY: 101%
Market capitalization -- BMBLF: $13.12B vs. SCGPY: $2.2B
BMBLF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $13.12B. SCGPY’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMBLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMBLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMBLF and SCGPY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMBLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGPY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMBLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCGPY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCGPY is a better buy in the short-term than BMBLF.

Price Growth

BMBLF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -3.49% price change this week, while SCGPY (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -5.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCGPY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.91% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMBLF($13.1B) has a higher market cap than SCGPY($2.2B). BMBLF has higher P/E ratio than SCGPY: BMBLF (21.51) vs SCGPY (11.74). SCGPY YTD gains are higher at: 59.331 vs. BMBLF (26.407). BMBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. SCGPY (392M). BMBLF has higher revenues than SCGPY: BMBLF (5.72B) vs SCGPY (4.53B).
BMBLFSCGPYBMBLF / SCGPY
Capitalization13.1B2.2B595%
EBITDA1.65B392M422%
Gain YTD26.40759.33145%
P/E Ratio21.5111.74183%
Revenue5.72B4.53B126%
Total Cash158MN/A-
Total Debt2.88BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMBLF vs SCGPY: Fundamental Ratings
BMBLF
SCGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2994
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4334
SMR RATING
1..100
8990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
273
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMBLF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGPY (31). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew similarly to SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBLF (43). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to BMBLF’s over the last 12 months.

BMBLF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGPY (90). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew similarly to SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBLF (45). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to BMBLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBLF (27). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to BMBLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMBLFSCGPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGVEX26.880.01
+0.04%
American Funds Global Insight F-1
JERSX12.02N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate S
INDZX17.64N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Value A
FSAVX59.77N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Automotive Port
FIQHX44.55N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Europe Z

BMBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBLF and SECUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBLF and SECUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBLF
1D Price
Change %
BMBLF100%
-6.35%
SECUF - BMBLF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
SCGPY - BMBLF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXPGF - BMBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
GECSF - BMBLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-10.16%
BXBLY - BMBLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More

SCGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGPY has been loosely correlated with SECUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGPY jumps, then SECUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGPY
1D Price
Change %
SCGPY100%
N/A
SECUF - SCGPY
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
BMBLF - SCGPY
29%
Poorly correlated
-6.35%
CASS - SCGPY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
GHC - SCGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
BRC - SCGPY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More