BMBLF
Price
$17.62
Change
+$0.29 (+1.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
23.76B
SCGPY
Price
$2.76
Change
-$0.32 (-10.39%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMBLF vs SCGPY

Header iconBMBLF vs SCGPY Comparison
Open Charts BMBLF vs SCGPYBanner chart's image
Brambles
Price$17.62
Change+$0.29 (+1.67%)
Volume$122
Capitalization23.76B
Serco Group
Price$2.76
Change-$0.32 (-10.39%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization3B
BMBLF vs SCGPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMBLF vs. SCGPY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBLF is a Hold and SCGPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BMBLF: $17.62 vs. SCGPY: $2.76)
Brand notoriety: BMBLF and SCGPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMBLF: 1% vs. SCGPY: 259%
Market capitalization -- BMBLF: $23.76B vs. SCGPY: $3B
BMBLF [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $23.76B. SCGPY’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMBLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMBLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMBLF is a better buy in the long-term than SCGPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMBLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMBLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCGPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMBLF is a better buy in the short-term than SCGPY.

Price Growth

BMBLF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +2.14% price change this week, while SCGPY (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -10.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.25% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMBLF($23.8B) has a higher market cap than SCGPY($3B). SCGPY has higher P/E ratio than BMBLF: SCGPY (40.91) vs BMBLF (28.32). SCGPY YTD gains are higher at: 61.506 vs. BMBLF (51.193). BMBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.12B vs. SCGPY (346M). BMBLF has higher revenues than SCGPY: BMBLF (6.64B) vs SCGPY (4.85B).
BMBLFSCGPYBMBLF / SCGPY
Capitalization23.8B3B792%
EBITDA2.12B346M612%
Gain YTD51.19361.50683%
P/E Ratio28.3240.9169%
Revenue6.64B4.85B137%
Total Cash113MN/A-
Total Debt2.64BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMBLF vs SCGPY: Fundamental Ratings
BMBLF
SCGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6888
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4135
SMR RATING
1..100
6591
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
224
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCGPY's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBLF (41). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to BMBLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBLF (41). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to BMBLF’s over the last 12 months.

BMBLF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGPY (91). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew similarly to SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

BMBLF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGPY (45). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew similarly to SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBLF (22). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to BMBLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMBLFSCGPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBSAX14.23N/A
N/A
VY® Baron Growth A
RYTIX239.54N/A
N/A
Rydex Technology Inv
ALVDX11.28N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val R6
IAAEX11.56N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps I2
JNRFX96.77N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Research D

BMBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBLF and SECUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBLF and SECUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBLF
1D Price
Change %
BMBLF100%
+1.69%
SECUF - BMBLF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
SCGPY - BMBLF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXPGF - BMBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
GECSF - BMBLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
BXBLY - BMBLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More

SCGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGPY has been loosely correlated with SECUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGPY jumps, then SECUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGPY
1D Price
Change %
SCGPY100%
N/A
SECUF - SCGPY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
BMBLF - SCGPY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
CASS - SCGPY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
GHC - SCGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
BRC - SCGPY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More