BMBN
Price
$31.25
Change
+$0.34 (+1.10%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
139.55M
COSO
Price
$21.31
Change
-$0.94 (-4.22%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
255.27M
8 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMBN vs COSO

Header iconBMBN vs COSO Comparison
Open Charts BMBN vs COSOBanner chart's image
Benchmark Bankshares
Price$31.25
Change+$0.34 (+1.10%)
Volume$13.33K
Capitalization139.55M
CoastalSouth Bancshares
Price$21.31
Change-$0.94 (-4.22%)
Volume$64.18K
Capitalization255.27M
BMBN vs COSO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMBN vs. COSO commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBN is a Buy and COSO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BMBN: $31.25 vs. COSO: $21.31)
Brand notoriety: BMBN and COSO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMBN: 427% vs. COSO: 257%
Market capitalization -- BMBN: $139.55M vs. COSO: $255.27M
BMBN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $139.55M. COSO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $255.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMBN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCOSO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMBN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • COSO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMBN is a better buy in the long-term than COSO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMBN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COSO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMBN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • COSO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMBN is a better buy in the short-term than COSO.

Price Growth

BMBN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.10% price change this week, while COSO (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

COSO is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COSO($255M) has a higher market cap than BMBN($140M). COSO has higher P/E ratio than BMBN: COSO (9.27) vs BMBN (8.10). BMBN YTD gains are higher at: 24.249 vs. COSO (-2.876). COSO has more cash in the bank: 21.4M vs. BMBN (18.5M). BMBN has less debt than COSO: BMBN (477K) vs COSO (14.8M). COSO has higher revenues than BMBN: COSO (70.5M) vs BMBN (57.6M).
BMBNCOSOBMBN / COSO
Capitalization140M255M55%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.249-2.876-843%
P/E Ratio8.109.2787%
Revenue57.6M70.5M82%
Total Cash18.5M21.4M86%
Total Debt477K14.8M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMBN vs COSO: Fundamental Ratings
BMBN
COSO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9956
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
542
SMR RATING
1..100
4246
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1753
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMBN's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as COSO (49). This means that BMBN’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

BMBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COSO (42). This means that BMBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than COSO’s over the last 12 months.

BMBN's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as COSO (46). This means that BMBN’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

BMBN's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as COSO (51). This means that BMBN’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

BMBN's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COSO (53). This means that BMBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than COSO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMBNCOSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
16%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRCDF1.37N/A
N/A
Intercede Group PLC
SABOF0.28N/A
N/A
Sabio Holdings Inc.
SHPMY8.00N/A
N/A
Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holdings Co., Ltd.
RHHBY40.12-0.75
-1.84%
Roche Holding Ltd
EUTLF3.75-0.10
-2.70%
Eutelsat Communications

BMBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBN and GWBK have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBN and GWBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBN
1D Price
Change %
BMBN100%
N/A
GWBK - BMBN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSO - BMBN
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
BKCYF - BMBN
21%
Poorly correlated
+25.20%
BLHK - BMBN
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNMDF - BMBN
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

COSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COSO has been loosely correlated with AMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COSO jumps, then AMBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COSO
1D Price
Change %
COSO100%
-4.22%
AMBK - COSO
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTYP - COSO
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMFG - COSO
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HONE - COSO
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
BMBN - COSO
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More