BMBN
Price
$27.50
Change
-$0.12 (-0.43%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
102.69M
COSO
Price
$20.13
Change
-$0.82 (-3.91%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
128.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMBN vs COSO

Header iconBMBN vs COSO Comparison
Open Charts BMBN vs COSOBanner chart's image
Benchmark Bankshares
Price$27.50
Change-$0.12 (-0.43%)
Volume$220
Capitalization102.69M
CoastalSouth Bancshares
Price$20.13
Change-$0.82 (-3.91%)
Volume$335
Capitalization128.12M
BMBN vs COSO Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMBN vs. COSO commentary
Jun 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBN is a Hold and COSO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2025
Stock price -- (BMBN: $27.50 vs. COSO: $20.13)
Brand notoriety: BMBN and COSO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMBN: 11% vs. COSO: 26%
Market capitalization -- BMBN: $102.69M vs. COSO: $128.12M
BMBN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $102.69M. COSO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $128.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMBN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCOSO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMBN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • COSO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMBN and COSO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BMBN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while COSO (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.02% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COSO($128M) has a higher market cap than BMBN($103M). BMBN YTD gains are higher at: 7.590 vs. COSO (-8.259). COSO has higher revenues than BMBN: COSO (67.8M) vs BMBN (14.5M).
BMBNCOSOBMBN / COSO
Capitalization103M128M80%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.590-8.259-92%
P/E RatioN/A6.12-
Revenue14.5M67.8M21%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A128M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMBN vs COSO: Fundamental Ratings
BMBN
COSO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2434
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1139
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COSO's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBN (58). This means that COSO’s stock grew similarly to BMBN’s over the last 12 months.

BMBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as COSO (39). This means that BMBN’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

BMBN's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as COSO (100). This means that BMBN’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

BMBN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as COSO (49). This means that BMBN’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

BMBN's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as COSO (100). This means that BMBN’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPET1.150.07
+6.48%
Trio Petroleum Corp
BYRN27.300.64
+2.40%
Byrna Technologies
IBKR208.20-1.48
-0.71%
Interactive Brokers Group
RELL8.76-0.19
-2.12%
Richardson Electronics Ltd
ICUI130.54-4.32
-3.20%
ICU Medical

BMBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBN and GWBK have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBN and GWBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBN
1D Price
Change %
BMBN100%
N/A
GWBK - BMBN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSO - BMBN
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.92%
BKCYF - BMBN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLHK - BMBN
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNMDF - BMBN
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

COSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COSO has been loosely correlated with AMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COSO jumps, then AMBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COSO
1D Price
Change %
COSO100%
-3.92%
AMBK - COSO
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTYP - COSO
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMFG - COSO
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMBN - COSO
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBZ - COSO
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More