Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMCAX vs RGACX
BMCAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BMCAX vs RGACX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv A
Price$26.48
Change-$0.16 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.04
Change-$0.80 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
BMCAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. BMCAX (1.6B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BMCAX: RGACX (0.07) vs BMCAX (0.00). BMCAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BMCAX (39 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BMCAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCAX: RGACX (250) vs BMCAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. BMCAX (6.39). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.08 vs. BMCAX (37.98).
| BMCAX | RGACX | BMCAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.749 | 16.738 | 82% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.39 | 12.33 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.52 | 71.09 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.98 | 45.08 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.82 | 110.29 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement