Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMCAX vs RGACX
BMCAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BMCAX vs RGACX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv A
Price$25.27
Change-$0.07 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
BMCAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCAX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. BMCAX (1.53B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BMCAX: RGACX (0.07) vs BMCAX (0.00). BMCAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BMCAX (39 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BMCAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCAX: RGACX (250) vs BMCAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.14 vs. BMCAX (10.61). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.49 vs. BMCAX (30.78).
| BMCAX | RGACX | BMCAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.198 | 12.557 | 65% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.61 | 17.14 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.09 | 39.62 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.78 | 40.49 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.20 | 81.90 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement