Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMCIX vs KNGAX
BMCIX vs KNGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCIX vs. KNGAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCIX is a Hold and KNGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMCIX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. KNGAX (46.2M). BMCIX pays higher dividends than KNGAX: BMCIX (7.89) vs KNGAX (1.45). BMCIX was incepted earlier than KNGAX: BMCIX (28 years) vs KNGAX (8 years). KNGAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than BMCIX (0.98). KNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 536.68 vs. BMCIX (130.00). KNGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCIX: KNGAX (1000) vs BMCIX (2000000). BMCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.78 vs. KNGAX (-10.60). BMCIX return over 5 years is better than : 65.08 vs. KNGAX (-0.28).
| BMCIX | KNGAX | BMCIX / KNGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.20 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.53 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.298 | -3.074 | -368% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 46.2M | 4,169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.89 | 1.45 | 546% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.78 | -10.60 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.70 | -10.50 | -312% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.08 | -0.28 | -23,016% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement