Ad is loading...
BMCIX vs KNGCX
BMCIX vs KNGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCIX vs. KNGCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCIX is a Hold and KNGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMCIX has more cash in the bank: 1.92B vs. KNGCX (56.9M). BMCIX pays higher dividends than KNGCX: BMCIX (7.99) vs KNGCX (0.22). BMCIX was incepted earlier than KNGCX: BMCIX (27 years) vs KNGCX (8 years). KNGCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than BMCIX (0.99). KNGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 536.68 vs. BMCIX (85.00). KNGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCIX: KNGCX (1000) vs BMCIX (2000000). BMCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. KNGCX (-9.19). BMCIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.86 vs. KNGCX (36.26).
| BMCIX | KNGCX | BMCIX / KNGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.95 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 2.15 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.072 | -1.715 | -179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 56.9M | 3,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.99 | 0.22 | 3,641% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | -9.19 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.68 | -15.59 | -101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.86 | 36.26 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...