Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMCIX vs KNGCX
BMCIX vs KNGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCIX vs. KNGCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCIX is a Hold and KNGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMCIX has more cash in the bank: 1.92B vs. KNGCX (46.2M). BMCIX pays higher dividends than KNGCX: BMCIX (7.89) vs KNGCX (0.56). BMCIX was incepted earlier than KNGCX: BMCIX (28 years) vs KNGCX (8 years). KNGCX (2.21) is less costly to investors than BMCIX (0.98). KNGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 536.68 vs. BMCIX (130.00). KNGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCIX: KNGCX (1000) vs BMCIX (2000000). BMCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. KNGCX (-11.25). BMCIX return over 5 years is better than : 65.09 vs. KNGCX (-4.03).
| BMCIX | KNGCX | BMCIX / KNGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.95 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 2.21 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.991 | -4.187 | -263% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 46.2M | 4,156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.89 | 0.56 | 1,420% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | -11.25 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.34 | -13.04 | -248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.09 | -4.03 | -1,615% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement