Ad is loading...
BMDIX vs FSMAX
BMDIX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMDIX vs FSMAX
Baird Mid Cap Growth Institutional
Price$20.57
Change-$1.10 (-5.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$78.74
Change-$5.91 (-6.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
BMDIX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMDIX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDIX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. BMDIX (1.48B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMDIX: FSMAX (0.53) vs BMDIX (0.00). BMDIX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMDIX (24 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BMDIX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMDIX: FSMAX (0) vs BMDIX (10000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. BMDIX (-14.96). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 106.28 vs. BMDIX (22.11).
| BMDIX | FSMAX | BMDIX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.04 | 2,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.04 | 2,343% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.257 | -6.855 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 36.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.96 | 3.80 | -394% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.31 | 8.54 | -168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.11 | 106.28 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.00 | 57.10 | 56% |