BMDPF
Price
$8.60
Change
+$0.05 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
301.01M
MTRBF
Price
$1.66
Change
-$0.04 (-2.35%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMDPF vs MTRBF

Header iconBMDPF vs MTRBF Comparison
Open Charts BMDPF vs MTRBFBanner chart's image
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a
Price$8.60
Change+$0.05 (+0.58%)
Volume$250
Capitalization301.01M
METRO BK
Price$1.66
Change-$0.04 (-2.35%)
Volume$640
CapitalizationN/A
BMDPF vs MTRBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTRBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMDPF vs. MTRBF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDPF is a Buy and MTRBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BMDPF: $8.60 vs. MTRBF: $1.66)
Brand notoriety: BMDPF and MTRBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMDPF: 31% vs. MTRBF: 8%
Market capitalization -- BMDPF: $301.01M vs. MTRBF: $0
BMDPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $301.01M. MTRBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMDPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTRBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMDPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MTRBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the long-term than MTRBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMDPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTRBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMDPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MTRBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the short-term than MTRBF.

Price Growth

BMDPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.58% price change this week, while MTRBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTRBF YTD gains are higher at: 64.356 vs. BMDPF (41.680).
BMDPFMTRBFBMDPF / MTRBF
Capitalization301MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.68064.35665%
P/E Ratio2.88N/A-
Revenue3.14BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.27BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMDPF vs MTRBF: Fundamental Ratings
BMDPF
MTRBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3451
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
924
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMDPF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRBF (12). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to MTRBF’s over the last 12 months.

MTRBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as BMDPF (100). This means that MTRBF’s stock grew similarly to BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRBF (24). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew similarly to MTRBF’s over the last 12 months.

MTRBF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BMDPF (44). This means that MTRBF’s stock grew similarly to BMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BMDPF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTRBF (99). This means that BMDPF’s stock grew significantly faster than MTRBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMDPFMTRBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTRBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAUZ23.060.22
+0.96%
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
OAIM38.800.30
+0.78%
OneAscent International Equity ETF
SCHD26.680.07
+0.26%
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
XFLX24.100.01
+0.04%
FundX Flexible ETF
DAGXF2.15N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch)

BMDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMDPF has been loosely correlated with PBLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMDPF jumps, then PBLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMDPF
1D Price
Change %
BMDPF100%
N/A
PBLOF - BMDPF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMERF - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBZ - BMDPF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
MTRBF - BMDPF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTR - BMDPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+14.24%
More

MTRBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTRBF and PBLOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTRBF and PBLOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTRBF
1D Price
Change %
MTRBF100%
N/A
PBLOF - MTRBF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIEB - MTRBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESBS - MTRBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIZN - MTRBF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
CKHGY - MTRBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More