Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMEAX vs GSFPX
BMEAX vs GSFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMEAX vs. GSFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMEAX is a Hold and GSFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.66B vs. BMEAX (1.92B). BMEAX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: BMEAX (7.65) vs GSFPX (1.11). BMEAX was incepted earlier than GSFPX: BMEAX (28 years) vs GSFPX (8 years). BMEAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). BMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 130.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMEAX: GSFPX (0) vs BMEAX (1000). BMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. GSFPX (4.61). BMEAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.61 vs. GSFPX (37.89).
| BMEAX | GSFPX | BMEAX / GSFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.68 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.74 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.759 | 10.237 | 105% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 3.66B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.65 | 1.11 | 687% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 4.61 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.34 | 37.49 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.61 | 37.89 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement