Advertisement
BMKDF vs CLVSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMKDF is a Hold and CLVSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BMKDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLVSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BMKDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CLVSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BMKDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BMKDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BMKDF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -5.55% price change this week, while CLVSF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.89%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.65%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (-0.49% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.82% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| BMKDF | CLVSF | BMKDF / CLVSF | |
| Capitalization | 24.1M | 439M | 5% |
| EBITDA | -1.22M | 197M | -1% |
| Gain YTD | 66.366 | -25.576 | -259% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 31.15 | - |
| Revenue | 155K | 751M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 2.09M | 155M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 359K | 30.2M | 1% |
BMKDF | CLVSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLVSF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as BMKDF (88). This means that CLVSF’s stock grew similarly to BMKDF’s over the last 12 months.
BMKDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CLVSF (100). This means that BMKDF’s stock grew similarly to CLVSF’s over the last 12 months.
CLVSF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMKDF (100). This means that CLVSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMKDF’s over the last 12 months.
BMKDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CLVSF (74). This means that BMKDF’s stock grew similarly to CLVSF’s over the last 12 months.
CLVSF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as BMKDF (100). This means that CLVSF’s stock grew similarly to BMKDF’s over the last 12 months.
| BMKDF | CLVSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 11% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 10% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
Advertisement
BMKDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BMKDF and PAVM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMKDF and PAVM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMKDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMKDF | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| PAVM - BMKDF | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.23% | ||
| IOBCF - BMKDF | 20% Poorly correlated | -7.90% | ||
| LUNG - BMKDF | 10% Poorly correlated | -5.17% | ||
| ELUT - BMKDF | 6% Poorly correlated | -6.27% | ||
| BFLY - BMKDF | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.49% | ||
More | ||||
CLVSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLVSF and PSNL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLVSF and PSNL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLVSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLVSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PSNL - CLVSF | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.13% | ||
| BDSX - CLVSF | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| SHC - CLVSF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| AVHHL - CLVSF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BMKDF - CLVSF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||