BMKDF
Price
$0.26
Change
+$0.03 (+13.04%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
27.34M
CLVSF
Price
$19.28
Change
-$6.63 (-25.59%)
Updated
Jan 23 closing price
Capitalization
420.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMKDF vs CLVSF

Header iconBMKDF vs CLVSF Comparison
Open Charts BMKDF vs CLVSFBanner chart's image
Biomark Diagnostics
Price$0.26
Change+$0.03 (+13.04%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization27.34M
Cellavision AB
Price$19.28
Change-$6.63 (-25.59%)
Volume$157
Capitalization420.98M
BMKDF vs CLVSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMKDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMKDF vs. CLVSF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMKDF is a Buy and CLVSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BMKDF: $0.25 vs. CLVSF: $19.28)
Brand notoriety: BMKDF and CLVSF are both not notable
BMKDF represents the Medical Specialties, while CLVSF is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMKDF: 110% vs. CLVSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BMKDF: $27.34M vs. CLVSF: $420.98M
BMKDF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $27.34M. CLVSF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $420.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $230.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $10.69B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMKDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLVSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMKDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLVSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMKDF and CLVSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMKDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BMKDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

BMKDF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +11.55% price change this week, while CLVSF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.35%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+0.63% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

@Medical/Nursing Services (+1.61% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLVSF($421M) has a higher market cap than BMKDF($27.3M). BMKDF YTD gains are higher at: 76.838 vs. CLVSF (-25.576). CLVSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 197M vs. BMKDF (-1.22M). CLVSF has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. BMKDF (2.09M). BMKDF has less debt than CLVSF: BMKDF (359K) vs CLVSF (30.2M). CLVSF has higher revenues than BMKDF: CLVSF (751M) vs BMKDF (155K).
BMKDFCLVSFBMKDF / CLVSF
Capitalization27.3M421M6%
EBITDA-1.22M197M-1%
Gain YTD76.838-25.576-300%
P/E RatioN/A31.15-
Revenue155K751M0%
Total Cash2.09M155M1%
Total Debt359K30.2M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMKDF vs CLVSF: Fundamental Ratings
BMKDF
CLVSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7041
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
10047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4075
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10080
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1830

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLVSF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BMKDF (85). This means that CLVSF’s stock grew similarly to BMKDF’s over the last 12 months.

BMKDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CLVSF (100). This means that BMKDF’s stock grew similarly to CLVSF’s over the last 12 months.

CLVSF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMKDF (100). This means that CLVSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMKDF’s over the last 12 months.

BMKDF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLVSF (75). This means that BMKDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLVSF’s over the last 12 months.

CLVSF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as BMKDF (100). This means that CLVSF’s stock grew similarly to BMKDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMKDFCLVSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMKDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKFKY10.980.23
+2.19%
Bakkafrost PF
BLMC1.88N/A
N/A
Biloxi Marsh Lands Corp.
DCOHF0.63N/A
N/A
Dickson Concepts International Ltd.
IPSEY34.85N/A
N/A
Ipsen S.A.
LKSB12.25N/A
N/A
Lakeside Bancshares Inc LA

BMKDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMKDF and PAVM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMKDF and PAVM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMKDF
1D Price
Change %
BMKDF100%
-1.92%
PAVM - BMKDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.48%
IOBCF - BMKDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
LUNG - BMKDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
ELUT - BMKDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
BFLY - BMKDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
More

CLVSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLVSF and PSNL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLVSF and PSNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLVSF
1D Price
Change %
CLVSF100%
N/A
PSNL - CLVSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
BDSX - CLVSF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
SHC - CLVSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
AVHHL - CLVSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMKDF - CLVSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More