Advertisement
BMR vs CYBCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMR is a Hold and CYBCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCYBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CYBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYBCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CYBCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BMR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.32% price change this week, while CYBCF (@Computer Communications) price change was -13.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -7.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.73%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-5.34% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-7.66% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| BMR | CYBCF | BMR / CYBCF | |
| Capitalization | 31.7M | 19.2M | 165% |
| EBITDA | -4.28M | -6.08M | 70% |
| Gain YTD | -58.537 | 8.661 | -676% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.41 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.13M | 2.39M | 131% |
| Total Cash | 13.9M | 146K | 9,521% |
| Total Debt | 151K | 2.02M | 7% |
| BMR | CYBCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 20 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
BMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMR has been loosely correlated with INTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMR jumps, then INTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMR | 100% | +4.08% | ||
| INTZ - BMR | 45% Loosely correlated | +6.62% | ||
| REKR - BMR | 43% Loosely correlated | +4.15% | ||
| SOUN - BMR | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| SWONF - BMR | 36% Loosely correlated | +4.11% | ||
| LPSN - BMR | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.84% | ||
More | ||||
CYBCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYBCF and SEEMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYBCF and SEEMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYBCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYBCF | 100% | -3.29% | ||
| SEEMF - CYBCF | 20% Poorly correlated | +14.48% | ||
| HUBC - CYBCF | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.70% | ||
| AICOF - CYBCF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BMR - CYBCF | 3% Poorly correlated | +4.08% | ||
| INSSF - CYBCF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||