Ad is loading...
BMR
Price
$2.61
Change
-$0.09 (-3.33%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
CYBCF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

BMR vs CYBCF

Header iconBMR vs CYBCF Comparison
Open Charts BMR vs CYBCFBanner chart's image
Beamr Imaging
Price$2.61
Change-$0.09 (-3.33%)
Volume$127.33K
CapitalizationN/A
Cybeats Technologies
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.98K
CapitalizationN/A
BMR vs CYBCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMR vs. CYBCF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMR is a Sell and CYBCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BMR: $2.61 vs. CYBCF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: BMR and CYBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMR: 89% vs. CYBCF: 13%
Market capitalization -- BMR: $92.9M vs. CYBCF: $39.28M
BMR [@Packaged Software] is valued at $92.9M. CYBCF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $39.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCYBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CYBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMR and CYBCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BMR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.12% price change this week, while CYBCF (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMR is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMR($92.9M) has a higher market cap than CYBCF($39.3M). BMR YTD gains are higher at: 80.000 vs. CYBCF (-37.043). BMR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -425K vs. CYBCF (-8.19M). BMR has more cash in the bank: 6.12M vs. CYBCF (590K). BMR has less debt than CYBCF: BMR (500K) vs CYBCF (1.07M). BMR has higher revenues than CYBCF: BMR (2.91M) vs CYBCF (333K).
BMRCYBCFBMR / CYBCF
Capitalization92.9M39.3M236%
EBITDA-425K-8.19M5%
Gain YTD80.000-37.043-216%
P/E Ratio13.68N/A-
Revenue2.91M333K874%
Total Cash6.12M590K1,037%
Total Debt500K1.07M47%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOGY0.05N/A
+9.09%
Golden Grail Technology Corp
ORRCF0.200.01
+4.26%
Oroco Resource Corp.
SWGAY9.340.26
+2.89%
Swatch Group AG
SCRYY2.410.03
+1.26%
SCOR
LZAGY57.53-4.74
-7.61%
Lonza Group AG

BMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMR has been loosely correlated with XIGMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMR jumps, then XIGMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMR
1D Price
Change %
BMR100%
-3.33%
XIGMF - BMR
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RTNXF - BMR
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SWONF - BMR
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LQWDF - BMR
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
IMMR - BMR
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
More

CYBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYBCF and SEEMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYBCF and SEEMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYBCF
1D Price
Change %
CYBCF100%
N/A
SEEMF - CYBCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUBC - CYBCF
11%
Poorly correlated
-7.12%
SHLT - CYBCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
AICOF - CYBCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.33%
BMR - CYBCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.33%
More