It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BMRA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BMRA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFWD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BMRA (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -7.33% price change this week, while LFWD (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.89%.
LFWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
BMRA | LFWD | BMRA / LFWD | |
Capitalization | 8.05M | 9.74M | 83% |
EBITDA | -4.71M | -15.13M | 31% |
Gain YTD | 31.623 | -64.156 | -49% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 5.68M | 24.4M | 23% |
Total Cash | 3.06M | 5.14M | 60% |
Total Debt | 543K | 375K | 145% |
BMRA | LFWD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LFWD's Valuation (27) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BMRA (31). This means that LFWD’s stock grew similarly to BMRA’s over the last 12 months.
LFWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BMRA (100). This means that LFWD’s stock grew similarly to BMRA’s over the last 12 months.
LFWD's SMR Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BMRA (100). This means that LFWD’s stock grew similarly to BMRA’s over the last 12 months.
BMRA's Price Growth Rating (86) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as LFWD (96). This means that BMRA’s stock grew similarly to LFWD’s over the last 12 months.
BMRA's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as LFWD (100). This means that BMRA’s stock grew similarly to LFWD’s over the last 12 months.
BMRA | LFWD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago80% | 12 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 2 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 5 days ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMRA has been loosely correlated with ZIMV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMRA jumps, then ZIMV could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMRA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BMRA | 100% | +0.32% | ||
ZIMV - BMRA | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
LFWD - BMRA | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
NVCR - BMRA | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
SENS - BMRA | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.12% | ||
EKSO - BMRA | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.37% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFWD has been loosely correlated with NNOX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFWD jumps, then NNOX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LFWD | 100% | -0.61% | ||
NNOX - LFWD | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
PEN - LFWD | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.78% | ||
QSI - LFWD | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
BMRA - LFWD | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
BFLY - LFWD | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.82% | ||
More |